I'll read Mr. Wakeman's "work" when I have more time than I do recently.
Mr Wakeman discredits himself by attempting to convince us that steel shot is the ballistic equal of lead, or even better. Time spent reading his "work" is time wasted.
Some shooters actually believe that nonsense, even though the density of lead versus steel is hardly a secret. The concepts of retained velocity and kinetic energy are not rocket science. A higher incidence of cripples ought to provide some clues too. It would be nice to think the average shooteer could grasp such simple concepts.
But then again, some shooters actually support people who spend a lifetime attempting to abolish guns and hunting. Go figure. Unfortunately, there are no requirements to exhibit even low intelligence in order to vote.
