Seems to me the article is focused on NEW products....nothing used was barely mentioned.
Precisely why I no longer subscribe to any of the older hunting and fishing rags. They write stuff that pleases their advertisers in order to "survive" (read, make money). The result is tainted. Shooting Sportsman was the last I dropped because of their stupid ads and cover pictures. In retrospect, DGJ is the only sporting periodical that I still have a paid subscription to. If I were to take out another it would be Sporting Classics. I do subscribe to Sporting Classics Daily, but it's free.
SRH
