Originally Posted By: Ted Schefelbein
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: keith
Alarm bells should go off in every law abiding gun owner's head when they see that Liberals are always more concerned about the Constitutional rights of gang-bangers and criminals than they are about law abiding citizens who exercise their right to own and shoot firearms.


Cherry picking who has constitutional rights and who does not is not indicative of a country based on liberty and the rule of law.

It is indicative of a totalinarian regime....

Like the nazi's.

Who would have figured coming from you?




No it isnt. If you are a convicted criminal, you give up rights that those who arent criminals do not. That is a hallmark of civilized society. Some civilized societies will allow you some of those back after certain conditions are met.
The presumes you are in a society that allows for individual rights. Most, dont.


Best,
Ted


You are confused Ted, Criminals do not give up their rights. They are disabused of certain rights through the process of law.

So with that in consideration, I fixed up what I think you were trying to say.

"That's exactly right. If you are a convicted criminal, you were subject to the due process and the rule of law and disabused of certain rights that those who arent criminals retain. The rights bestowed by and the laws of a society must be applied equally to everybody. This is a hallmark of civilized society. Some civilized societies will allow you some of those back after certain conditions are met, such as ours.

The presumes you are in a society that allows for individual rights. Most, dont."

Glad I could help!

Forum: a medium of discussion/expression of ideas. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forum