And, he said it about sk's, and he generally mentioned weapons of war. What I believe is still important is that no law abiding gun owner, on either side of the aisle, can point to honest and factual reasons for their policy and the tactics they're using or give a factual assessment of how the results will either improve safety or quench their appetite for more.

The only reason for being wowed by what some of these characters say, is to legitimize their position. I still believe they will take an inch or a mile, both gladly, and it will happen only because, policy makers on the right will capitulate to their feelings.

I believe registration, due to taxing, fees and criminalization, will be far more significant and consequential than any firearm specific ban that may or may not happen. If the law is followed, there is no 'loophole', so what do you think needs closing?