Originally Posted By: keith
Originally Posted By: SKB



" I told you guns were not registered in New Zealand.

Steve



We heard you the first time Stevie.




"The attacks happened in spite of gun registration" is what you stated.

Does that mean some, all or no guns? For that to be a factually correct statement it would need to mean SOME. Some guns at the time were registered, 3% while 97% were not. I replied using the exact same terminology you used, simply guns. My statement that guns are not registered, meaning some or actually the vast majority of guns(97%), was correct. I never once used the term NO GUNS. So apparently in your twisted mind it was to be understood as SOME GUNS for YOUR statement but NO GUNS for my statement.

You could not be more a deceptive weasel if you tried William.

I NEVER SAID NO GUN REGISTRATION BUT USED THE SAME TERMINOLOGY AS YOU did you LYING LOW LIFE.


http://www.bertramandco.com/
Booking African hunts, firearms import services

Here for the meltdowns