"It really does matter who we put in the White House when it come to maintaining our Constitutional Right to own and shoot firearms, and that includes our doubles."
keith, the treaty has nothing to do with our doubles....
King, did you read or listen to the words of the US President? He accurately framed the issue as a national sovereignty issue. How would you expect an international arms treaty to work without identifying the 'arms'? Of course, it's rediculous to think a eurocrat will come knocking on a US door to confiscate, there would be many smaller increments that preceeded, eh?
Don't worry yourself over reports of infighting at the NRA, a sitting US President wouldn't give a policy speech at a venue that wasn't fully vetted. Their brand is just fine in truth, just not in the hearts of those who feel otherwise. Are they investigating 'finances' or contributions to lawmakers that implement policy that agrees with the NRA's stated goals? Don't forget, 'Natural England' is a powerful group of buddies that may have an agenda, but certainly has a CEO.
edit to add, nca and secular progressives, better than any fund raising drive the NRA could dream up
