For those who didn't see it in the "Contraception Mandate" thread, here's some more of King Brown's dishonesty on display concerning our Second Amendment. The first King quote was from one of his very recent attempts to now portray himself as a staunch gun rights advocate...from his post# 372221. First, he's telling us that he believes what Constitutional Scholar Mark Levin has to say about the Second Amendment, but he goes on to lament that the Framers did not put their thoughts about what the Second Amendment said in writing. He managed to squeeze two big lies into one short paragraph. Jim replied to him at length...again! And my reply follows his lies and bullshit... along with another of his quotes to prove he's lying. There, he had tried to convince us that Mark Levin only believed that the 2nd protected the RTKBA within the confines of a Militia... the same Militia that Liberals like he and ed are constantly saying is obsolete. He was also trying to portray ex-SCOTUS Justice John Paul Stevens as a Conservative. Lies on top of filthy lies! The second King quote is from post #371868.

So here's King Brown trying to dishonestly re-cast himself as one of us!.... But he's not one of us. No friend of ours would try so hard and so frequently to discredit the Second Amendment.

Originally Posted By: King Brown
I believe what Levin says about the Second was in the the Founders' minds. The pity is they didn't write it down. They wanted to protect the states from federal interference, for sure. But the country is still wrangling with the Second to the point that courts are allowing various levels to regulate from popular vote.


Oh, but they did write it down King. Many of them, and in a multitude of places. We have given you ample references over the years, but you are just like the Jurists who choose to legislate from the bench and choose to ignore the original intent of the founders. The quotes provided above by Jim are but a small fraction, and he has given them to you many times before. Where do you come off pretending to be so civil when you are nothing but a compulsive liar?

And even if they did go on and on and dot every I and cross every T, and add footnotes and Cliffs Notes... it wouldn't be enough. And you and your kind would still be looking for the same kind of dishonest loophole you found to justify Obama's violations of his Oath of Office.

And if you really believe what Levin said about the Second was in the founder's minds, why did you dishonestly try to say he only recognized a right to bear arms within the confines of a Militia? Here it is again... in your own lying words King:

Originally Posted By: King Brown
Levin and Stevens, on this evidence, appear to believe that the Second amendment should only apply only to those who keep and bear arms while serving in the militia, and not as an individual right. Stevens goes further in his book, saying democratic processes should decide on the matter, not the judges, as a remedy for "what every American can recognize as an ongoing national tragedy."

All from a Reagan conservative and a Nixon-appointed jurist.


It's hard to keep all your lies straight when you tell so many, isn't it?

A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.