What am I missing here. It's not Bundy's land, regardless of how long his ancestors have run cattle on it.

Ted, unless property laws are wildly different down there, your statement suggesting that because it may be state land, then it belongs to Bundy doesn't make sense to me. The state is a legal entity. It can own property. That doesn't mean the citizens own the property and can do what they please on it any more than they can act as the boss of state employees. e.g. "As your boss, Mr State Trooper, I'm ordering you not to write up that speeding ticket."

Last edited by canvasback; 04/12/14 09:49 AM.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia