Justin, there is a possibility that the "abridging" of the patent of 1866, No 1793 that I posted , was responsible for no forend latch being mentioned. Maybe not, though. Mike Petrov had some thoughts a few months ago that he tries to verify everything he reads or hears. That might be a good thing in this case. It is "easy" to copy something someone else has written, sort of trying to make it fact. You mention the possibility of Dallas using the Crudgington and Baker material on this subject . I have seen a couple of times when Crudgington and Baker had errors, confusing one man with another with a similar name. I do not disparage their EPIC work,it is the best there is, but those things can happen, and if copied and repeated they become hard to correct. Keep digging.
Last edited by Daryl Hallquist; 02/27/12 09:19 PM.
