Kerryman,
What was the fool in No. 1100 doing for the eight years of his watch?
Must agree it is hard to answer. In any case that someone didn't try to solve a problem does not shift the origin of it.
Some more about the "needed change" you advocate:
"In Rules for Radicals Alinsky writes, "There's another reason for working inside the system. Dostoevsky said that taking a new step is what people fear most. Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution."
This is where Senator Barack Obama's campaign about "Change" comes from. He is not talking about positive change but rather the change outlined by his mentor Saul Alinsky. Revolutionary change. Socialist change."This from:
Saul Alinsky - yet another Obama mentor from his Marxist past I cannot agree with you that an Obama government is the one the US deserves.
And I am sure it would not be the one to redeem its former position.
On the other hand I suppose by now that alea jacta est.
JC
P.S.: Did you get a chance to read the articles mentioned in my previous post? jc
