April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Who's Online Now
1 members (Mike Harrell), 413 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,480
Posts545,229
Members14,410
Most Online1,335
Apr 27th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Gentlemen, I have been reading about bores and chokes and have measured one of my doubles, an Ithaca NID and found the bores are around .740 and the chokes .20 and .30 (as I measure them). Having always heard 12ga bores were closer to .725-.729 it got me doing research. I discovered Kolar guns are bored .750 and their choke restrictions are standard. For example Kolar's .750 is reduced .35 for full choke. They say the patterns are better. I am thinking that their thinking is that less force is exerted on the shot as it passes the choke? The pattern result is the same- I guess? My guns restriction is .20 and .30 so I'm thinking improved modified and modified, but it is marked 2 and 4 which I thought was modified and full. I know the pattern board is the real answer to chokes, but I wondering about the Kolar theory? I was going to have the chokes opened on this gun, but now better get the paper out. What are your thoughts? Thank-you, Kurt

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983
Hi Kurt,
12 ga., going strictly BY the gauge system, IS .729, for a fact. However, gunmakers don't have to follow the rules. Browning have made their older guns .724-725, Beretta has made their "12 gauges" .721" and the newer magic recoil reducing, pattern improving, physics-defying miracles have many makers using bores of .733-750". Whether or not you believe this crap(my word) is up to you. Constrictions required to produce a given choke effect is generally more for larger gauges and less for smaller gauges. I would suggest your measurements of .020" and .030"(not .20 and .30), are about modified and improved modified, respectively. I don't think the amount of constriction will vary much within an alleged gauge designation. Meaning that .035" or thereabouts will give you a full choke in 12 gauge, regardless of whether the actual bore ID is .721" or .750"
I would not worry about it. Trust the manufacturer to know how to make chokes. If you WANT more open chokes, have them opened a bit but don't go nuts worrying about a couple thousandths difference between one brand and another.


> Jim Legg <

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812
Stan Baker overbored more than .750". The Barnes "Moneymaker" aftermarket on my m12 measures .779". Obviously a nominal 10 ga. bore with 12 ga chamber and there is very little cone between chamber and bore. Relative constriction of the Colonial Arms choke tubes is pretty close to normal 12 ga. numbers.

jack

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
Happy birthday Jim!!

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,889
Likes: 107
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,889
Likes: 107
What is the serial number range of your NID. My earlier NIDs tend to have larger bore diameters and those after 1935 seem to be pretty close to standard. I had a Grade 1E 12-gauge in the 441xxx range and its bore diameter was .744". Maybe these early overbored guns were that magical boring Ithaca advertised by Uncle Bob Edwards?!? The 12-gauge NID I have now is in the 461xxx range, shipped in 1936, and is .730" left and .729" right. My 16-gauge NID is a 1941 gun and is right on the money at .662" bore diameters. My 20-gauge was shipped in 1933 and has a bore diameters of .623" right and .629" left. My .410-bore was shipped in 1934 and has bore diameters of .415". There ia a bore chamber and choke diameters chart produced by Ithaca with dates from 1939 and 1945 reproduced in "Shotguns by Keith" on page 113, and it gives the bore diameters of .775" .729" .662" .615" .550" and .410".

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,377
Likes: 105
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,377
Likes: 105
I've measured a couple Parkers that ran about .750. And there was still PLENTY of choke left in those guns, so I don't think they were reamed post-production or anything like that. Just measured a Parker Reproduction today: .735. Seem to recall a couple other 12ga Repros I've measured are about the same.

Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered

Thanks for the replies and the zeros Jim, Happy Birthday too! As said I believe the thinking Kolar has is that lead shot is less likely to be deformed by their combination thus yielding better patterns. My NID is a 1926 gun, well taken care of and I'm certain it was not tampered with as I bought it from the 85 year old son of the original owner. Researcher my guns bores would be further evidence as to what you have found in earlier NIDs. L.B. I consider Parkers good company to be with in the overbore group and Jack- your MoneyMaker must be working with the same idea as Kolar. Jim's assessment of Improved modified and modified sounds good in that order. Thanks again for your ideas! Kurt

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983
Thank you for the birthday thoughts! I had a nice old Parker that had .750" bores and plenty of choke, too. Oscar told me that some were made that way to work well with brass shells and the 11 ga. wads that were used in them. The gun shot fine with modern plastic wads and smokeless low pressure loads but I hated the brass shells and got rid of the gun and the brass shells. Too much work for nothing.


> Jim Legg <

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456
Likes: 86
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456
Likes: 86
Jim in old guns that were over bored to shoot brass shells with over size wads do you think plastic wads designed for a smaller bore diameter can cause pressure problems and or velocity loss.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 12
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954
Likes: 12
ben-t, shot does not get deformed in the choke constriction. It flows through the constriction and actually is subjected to a loss of internal pressure. This is what reduces the spring-apart as it exits the muzzle. It also gains a little velocity as it passes through the choke. But, it does not get deformed. Shot deformation is due to acceleration setback at primer ignition to peak pressure.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 803
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 803
Kolar has done some excellent work on thier barrels and chokes. With the over sized bores, virtually no forcing cone and porting, the overall recoil is about the same in my perception but the gun jumps less and the patterns are the best I have ever seen. I patterned my Kolar in Kolar's Proof Room while testing for Point of Impact and the resulting pattern's even distribution were impressive.
I don't think that the bore of your Ithaca will really do anything to affect recoil and as you say the pattern board is where you will see the results.-Dick

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983
Originally Posted By: HomelessjOe
Jim in old guns that were over bored to shoot brass shells with over size wads do you think plastic wads designed for a smaller bore diameter can cause pressure problems and or velocity loss.

I traded for the nice old Parker, at the Beinfeld show, thinking it would be good for BP skeet matches. I was told it was IC and IC, nothing about an odd bore size. When I got it home and measured it, I found this overbore size and Full/Full chokes. I bought a case of brass shells and got all rigged up to load them. The smokeless. plastic wad loads I used shot fine but I never chronographed them. To me, it seems likely the pressure and velocity would be somewhat less but that's just a speculation on my part. Anyway, I disliked the ordeal of dealing with the brass shells and sold gun, shells and all the reloading stuff for them.


> Jim Legg <

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.085s Queries: 39 (0.062s) Memory: 0.8504 MB (Peak: 1.8989 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-29 06:18:35 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS