|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,374
Posts544,019
Members14,391
|
Most Online1,258 Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,113 Likes: 26
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,113 Likes: 26 |
I just bought a Charles Clarke rifle built by Joseph Lang. It's a SXS hammer gun with Jones Underlever. The rifle was originally built as a .450 but sleeved and reproofed in Birmingham in the 1930s to 7X57R. I have a drilling in 7X57R and a lifetime supply of RWS brass in the caliber. I don't see anything on the barrel flats regarding bullet weight from the photos. (I haven't received the rifle yet). What bullet weight would most likely have been employed in the 1930s in a British double rifle in this caliber? Any suggestions as to where to start?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,113 Likes: 26
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,113 Likes: 26 |
Correction: Henry Clarke. 4420 BAR. Proof pressure. That sounds more like the 80s than the thirties.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,445 Likes: 201
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,445 Likes: 201 |
Vol, Smart money would be on 173 grain bullets( or whatever you can find close to that). Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,522 Likes: 167
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,522 Likes: 167 |
YES Start heavy, work to a lighter bullet 173 or so would be me choice also.
But the 275 Rigby also had a 140 grain loading
Mike
USAF RET 1971-95
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350 |
Superb in my circa 1950 Brno 7mm Mauser are Federal 140gr and Dominion 139gr.
|
|
|
|
|
|