May
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
6 members (Stanton Hillis, Hal M Hare, SKB, Guy Ave, Jimmy W, 1 invisible), 997 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,504
Posts545,545
Members14,416
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 17 18
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 4
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 4
Rocky Mtn Bill perfectly illustrates the liberal mindset. First, our betters in the government know whats best for us. If we dont agree, we are immature, irresponsible and exhibit poor judgment. Second, in order to satisfy the governments insatiable appetite for revenue, our benign government overlords have to confiscate wealth from those who have earned it so the government can give it to more deserving groups


Nothing the government gives you is free.
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 122
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 122
When you're sitting in court for an NFA violation, they are going to get very technical about what a machine gun is and how it operates.

That's why it is important to follow the mechanics of an item and not how it looks or feels to someone, anyone. Doing that is very arbitrary and is only relevant to the person looking or feeing.

But any of this is not the way to address the issue of controlling crime.

To control crime you control criminals.

If controlling guns is your goal, then you control guns.

Seems like a fairly simple concept to me.

If I learned anything in my job, it was that nothing happens spontaneously or in a vacuum. Somebody ALWAYS knows about anything BEFORE it happens.


Alan

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
Bill, are you familiar with this writing of Pastor Martin Niemoller ?

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for meand there was no one left to speak for me.

O.M

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 593
The 1996 "National Firearms Buyback Program" took 660,959 firearms out of private hands[1] comprising long guns, mostly semi-automatic rimfire rifles and shotguns as well as pump-action shotguns, and a smaller proportion of higher powered or military type semi-automatic rifles. Because the Australian Constitution requires the Commonwealth to pay "just compensation" for private property it takes over, the Government increased the Medicare levy from 1.5% to 1.7% of income for one year to finance the buyback program. The buyback was expected to cost $500 million.[2] The payments from the Commonwealth were conditional on the States and Territories introducing firearms laws and regulations consistent with the National Firearms Agreement.

O.M

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,491
Likes: 395
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,491
Likes: 395
Originally Posted By: craigd
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
....When gun owners support any damned thing having to do with firearms, we present ourselves as morons....

So, if I like your gun and accessory list, then I'm not a moron? My aha moment!


Summed up perfectly. Completely comprehensible Craig. laugh


The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 25
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 25
As usual, Craig, your logic is faulty. Liking my guns wouldn't rule out the possibility you're a moron. And there are morons who don't like bumpstocks. People who own and enjoy firearms ought to be more resourceful in defending them and at the same time more creative in finding ways to diminish their misuse. The automatic assumption that all gun regulations are merely an intro to general confiscation is stupid and merely an excuse for not thinking seriously about lessening gun violence.


Bill Ferguson
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344
Likes: 390
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344
Likes: 390
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
Defending bump stocks and saying that their ban is just the tip of an ice burg strikes me as foolish, and in the long run, harmful to gun rights. What mature, responsible person would want a bump stock? Someone who finds using one to be amusing is someone whose judgement ought to be questioned. When gun owners support any damned thing having to do with firearms, we present ourselves as morons.


As usual Billy, your logic is faulty. Anti-gunners with your Liberal Left mindset say pretty much the same things about many other firearms as you say about bump stocks and military style semi-automatics.

For example, many Liberal Left anti-gunners have argued for years that semi-automatic "assault style" rifles are "weapons of war", and have no useful purpose besides killing people. You have made statements in the past that agree with that opinion.

Many Liberal Left anti-gunners have argued for years that handguns are useless for hunting and only good for killing people.

Many Liberal Left anti-gunners have argued for years that detachable magazines of certain capacities they consider excessive are dangerous, and should be banned. Don't many FUDD's like you think that we don't really need those 10, 12, 20, or 30 round magazines?

Many Liberal Left anti-gunners have argued for years that cartridges such as the 5.56 m/m or .223 Rem are designed for war, and can penetrate police body armor and have much higher velocity than dangerous handgun ammunition.

So if a .223 or 5.56 m/m is too powerful Billy and dangerous, where does that leave you and your .308, or .30-06 or 7 m/m mag?

In recent years, these same Liberal Left anti-gunners... the politicians you support... have been arguing that scoped bolt action rifles, such as the rifles you personally approve of, are super-dangerous sniper rifles.

So tell us Billy... using your flawed and faulty logic... do you present yourself as a moron when you own and shoot scoped bolt action rifles that many of your own Liberal Left consider to be dangerous sniper rifles which are unsuited for civilian ownership???

Who makes someone with logic as flawed as yours the arbiter of what firearms are Constitutionally protected and suitable for law abiding citizens to own and shoot??? And just what are you doing to diminish gun violence... aside from voting for the Liberal Left Democrats who work relentlessly to ban them all??? The "automatic assumption that all gun regulations are merely an intro to general confiscation" is not stupid, as you say. That assumption comes when Democrats like Barack Obama and Barbara Boxer come right out and publicly say that we don't need any guns or that they would round them all up tomorrow, if they could. It would be both moronic and dishonest of you to deny that fact.





A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,994
Likes: 402
SKB Online Content
Sidelock
***
Online Content
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,994
Likes: 402
Originally Posted By: craigd
Originally Posted By: bladeswitcher
....My solution? Add them to the NFA registry. Tell folks they have X amount of time to either turn them in or register them. Make the tax fee reasonable ....

And, what part of this stock is a firearm of any sort? Maybe, we should worry about who is put in charge of reasonable taxes for double guns, if we dont like it we could always turn them in.


Same can be said of silencers but those are on the NFA list. I have lost zero sleep over this ruling. If a more useless device has been invented I have not seen it. About as useful as good sized hole in your head.


http://www.bertramandco.com/
Booking African hunts, firearms import services

Here for the meltdowns
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 531
Likes: 26
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 531
Likes: 26
As stupid and useless as bump stocks are, Im not sure banning a device this simple to make is good law. Anybody who wants a bump stock can cobble one together.

I've grown so cynical. Gun control has nothing to do with reducing crime or violence. Confiscation and bans arent an immediate threat either. Nope, the sole purpose of gun control is to annoy target shooters and hunters. Create barriers and obstacles that discourage people from participating in shooting sports and then your whole deplorable gun culture shrinks away in a couple generations. It's all just to annoy you.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703
Likes: 103
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703
Likes: 103
Ryan may be right, they sure are annoying me...Geo

Page 5 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 17 18

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.083s Queries: 35 (0.059s) Memory: 0.8724 MB (Peak: 1.8989 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-06 10:59:47 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS