May
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
8 members (MattH, Ken Georgi, earlyriser, FlyChamps, Hugh Lomas, cpa), 246 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,492
Posts545,326
Members14,410
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
Canvasback notes that the barrels were "Nitro proofed from between 1905 and 1910 from my preliminary investigation." But what is the date the gun was originally made per the Boss records? The Damascus pattern is Turkish or so-called English Best. I am very familiar with a Boss side-snap made in 1886 that has the same Damascus pattern. The barrels on the Boss I am referring to were stamped 'CL', indicating that barrel work was done by Lancaster. That does not necessarily mean that the Damascus tubes were manufactured by Lancaster. Based on sources Doc Drew has provided, the tubes themselves could be Belgian. Here are his wonderful quotes:

Thomas Webley c. 1879, in John Henry Walsh's "The Shotgun" said "Quite three-fourths of the tubes used in Birmingham are Belgian make, and nearly all the London trade use them."

And James Purdey II admitted as much c. 1890 when he wrote that he preferred Damascus to steel barrels, but acknowledged that "...weight for weight steel is stronger than iron and shoots harder, though not of so handsome an appearance as damascus barrels." He favored Belgian damascus because "...not that when thorough sound English damascus can be obtained they are not superior, but because Belgian workmen are more careful than English, and there is thus less risk of slag and rubbish getting into the welds." I don't think there is a visible trace of "slag or rubbish" in the barrels shown in Canvasback's pictures.

Very difficult, if not impossible, to know for sure, but tubes made by a London maker, at least from the time of the Webley quote (1879) forward, could have been Belgian tubes finished and fitted by the English trade in London or Birmingham, since no less than James Purdey II favored Belgian Damascus over English because "Belgian workmen are more careful than English."


Rich
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 394
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 394
I'm basing the age on the serial number guide in Nigel Brown's British Gunmakers. He lists serial # range from 4700 to 6000 as dating between 1900 and 1910. These numbers are 5819 & 5820.

Brown also notes Boss had a habit of assigning serial numbers from when the "barrels are first lumped up together". I'm not sure how that tidbit would affect the dating of the barrels. However the gun could have been made years later if that's true.

The seller and I can't agree on a price so I most definitely will not be getting the Boss records.

Thanks all for your input.

Last edited by canvasback; 04/15/18 10:03 AM.

The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 521
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 521
Originally Posted By: RichardBrewster
Canvasback notes that the barrels were "Nitro proofed from between 1905 and 1910 from my preliminary investigation." But what is the date the gun was originally made per the Boss records? The Damascus pattern is Turkish or so-called English Best. I am very familiar with a Boss side-snap made in 1886 that has the same Damascus pattern. The barrels on the Boss I am referring to were stamped 'CL', indicating that barrel work was done by Lancaster. That does not necessarily mean that the Damascus tubes were manufactured by Lancaster. Based on sources Doc Drew has provided, the tubes themselves could be Belgian. Here are his wonderful quotes:

Thomas Webley c. 1879, in John Henry Walsh's "The Shotgun" said "Quite three-fourths of the tubes used in Birmingham are Belgian make, and nearly all the London trade use them."

And James Purdey II admitted as much c. 1890 when he wrote that he preferred Damascus to steel barrels, but acknowledged that "...weight for weight steel is stronger than iron and shoots harder, though not of so handsome an appearance as damascus barrels." He favored Belgian damascus because "...not that when thorough sound English damascus can be obtained they are not superior, but because Belgian workmen are more careful than English, and there is thus less risk of slag and rubbish getting into the welds." I don't think there is a visible trace of "slag or rubbish" in the barrels shown in Canvasback's pictures.

Very difficult, if not impossible, to know for sure, but tubes made by a London maker, at least from the time of the Webley quote (1879) forward, could have been Belgian tubes finished and fitted by the English trade in London or Birmingham, since no less than James Purdey II favored Belgian Damascus over English because "Belgian workmen are more careful than English."


Was the Boss you mentioned rebarreled by Lancaster? I find it odd that a gun made during that time would have CL barrels. There were after all, competitors. CL marked barrels on other guns would usually be older hammer guns, muzzle loaders, etc.
Like I mentioned earlier.....Ive found during research I’ve conducted on CL (my favorite maker) by the time the 1880’s rolled around, CL was out of the barrel making business and making actual guns and competing with other top London makers.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,420
Likes: 314
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,420
Likes: 314
c. 1824 Purdey 20g percussion fowler with Charles Lancaster Stub Twist barrels



The barrels are indeed 4 Iron (Turkish) British Best; 3 full scrolls between two 1/2 scrolls. IMHO they were Belgian sourced.
BTW Bro. Culver would see 3 'zipper' welds between each straight ribband edge weld wink



I wonder if the barrels were originally 'black & white' and intended for the North American market

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 394
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 394
LeFusil, it has been speculated here that the barrels may have been by CL. Zero markings to that effect. The ONLY markings on the barrels, other than what can be seen on the flats in my photos, are the serial numbers and the name "BOSS".

There is no CL anywhere.


The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 521
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 521
Originally Posted By: canvasback
LeFusil, it has been speculated here that the barrels may have been by CL. Zero markings to that effect. The ONLY markings on the barrels, other than what can be seen on the flats in my photos, are the serial numbers and the name "BOSS".

There is no CL anywhere.


CB,
I was referring to the 1886 Boss that Mr Brewster was talking about...not “your” gun. Sorry for the confusion.

Yes, in 1824.....CL was arguably the best barrel maker in England. Lots of panache attached to the CL barrel brand.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 532
Likes: 1
LeFusil, The Boss I mentioned has serial number 3857, which appears on the barrels, forend iron and the receiver. On the underside of the barrels on both tubes "CL" appears in front of the serial number. The top rib is marked "Boss & Co. 73 St. James's Street London". The Boss has a Perkes side snap action. Nothing to indicate it was ever rebarreled. According to Boss's records, the gun was one of a pair sold in 1886 to J.C. Ingram of Hyde Park, London.


Rich
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 394
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 394
LOL, So it's me who can't read. Sorry about that. blush


The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 521
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 521
Originally Posted By: RichardBrewster
LeFusil, The Boss I mentioned has serial number 3857, which appears on the barrels, forend iron and the receiver. On the underside of the barrels on both tubes "CL" appears in front of the serial number. The top rib is marked "Boss & Co. 73 St. James's Street London". The Boss has a Perkes side snap action. Nothing to indicate it was ever rebarreled. According to Boss's records, the gun was one of a pair sold in 1886 to J.C. Ingram of Hyde Park, London.


Pretty cool. This Boss is definitely the latest gun I’ve ever heard of bearing the CL mark on the barrels that was not an actual C. Lancaster made gun. I’m speculating that the tubes might have been “old stock” that sat around for years until they were made into a useable barrel set. Totally possible. Wasn’t too long ago G. Greener, Tandy, Dryhurst found a good number of “new” Damascus barrels that were stored in barrels, perfectly preserved.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,993
Likes: 402
SKB Online Content
Sidelock
***
Online Content
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,993
Likes: 402
Johnson's just posted a photo this morning on Facebook of some just finished Greener 8 bore barrels. I'm sure from the find you referred
to. Pretty sure Peter Higgins was the barrel man. What a beauty.


http://www.bertramandco.com/
Booking African hunts, firearms import services

Here for the meltdowns
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.091s Queries: 34 (0.068s) Memory: 0.8554 MB (Peak: 1.8989 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-05-01 21:01:40 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS