doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Off Topic- Time to Raise the Legal Driving Age

Take your eye off this BBS for a little while, it sure can go sideways. Careful Steve, remember when Amarillo went nuts. It is just a chat room...Geo

Buzz, There are federal regulations against buying heroin. Does that make you want to go out and lay in a supply?

Let me ask you this, what does heroin have to do with gun control and the 2nd Amendment?? I think that�s what we have been talking about for 26 pages unless I missed something.

You made this comment immediately after your cc smart long game sells comment.

If I'm not mistaken, that cc reciprocity act has an age minimum of 21yrs. I understand the reciprocity act argument fits your position about 'strengthening' background checks, but does it help your young people argument? Is it helpful to frame the discussion of restricting a Constitutional Right to things 'we want to see' and 'our sport'? It may be better to defend a right rather than have dueling wants, and be handicapped by an unaddressed image problem?

Did you catch that comment on the 'gunbroker' thread? Seems there is some requirement to use leadsonline to transfer. Is that yet another model for establishing a de facto registry, in the name of 'strengthening' the background check?

I think what was meant was that if Colorado said they were ending their pot experiment on April 1st., there would be a run on pot too. I bet even if it was an April fool joke, the snowflakes would make a run on pot just on the rumor.

Federal law has not changed Craig, must be 21 to posses a handgun. Can not make the reciprocity law with a lower age than the age of possession. So are you saying reciprocity should have included lowering the handgun possession age? That would have been awful tough to get through even the House.

The Fix NICS attachment has no registry provision I know of. I can not imagine a registry getting past Paul Ryan, but then maybe he is a deep under cover liberal.

Big difference between this one and that one Geo. That was two guys who had a disagreement that escalated to extremes. I can respect the notion that neither guy was willing to blink or back down. They weren't attempting to disrupt any gun rights threads in the hopes of causing a shit-storm and getting it locked, as Stevie, Last Dollar, and other Liberal Left trolls did so many times in the past. I'm sorry I took their bait so many times. And they weren't posting a bunch of off-topic fluff and baseless twisting in order to drive their previous denigrating of the NRA and other crap off the front page after it was pointed out that they might be hurting their own future business. Considering the importance of preserving our 2nd Amendment Rights, didn't you also feel that he would have been better off not posting anything at all if he couldn't make any positive contributions?

By the way, what did you think of Stevie's admission that he permitted the ATF Agents to photograph his Bound Ledger Books? As a lawyer, do you think they had the legal right to do that? And do you feel he should have refused their totally inappropriate request or demand?



I think that's big and very disturbing news, and it should make us wonder just how widespread that practice is or was. Of course, noticing things like that, and those huge piles of sporting firearms that suddenly became illegal in Australia will get you branded as a conspiracy nut by Stevie. Here's a full page ad (or conspiracy theory) that appeared in Australian newspapers in 2017. Schindler's List anyone?

Naw, all I was pointing out was that you used the example to sell your long game. Since it's a long game, it would seem nice to have some dots connected. How does the ole image get improved by splitting hairs between inaction and non action?

I don't believe I have mentioned NICS, fixed or unfixed. I just think there're different models for a universal registry being trialled at this time, and think of what we could do with a registry if we could only get a non narcissist in place that makes us feel better. Isn't mentioning an image problem exactly the same as saying the other side has a long game, and a short game, and a medium game? I'll bet they'll happily hand out participation trophies.

You do not understand the issue as usual. Mr. Earle fought the ATF over them REMOVING the books from he shop. He did not stop them from accessing the information in them. The law states the books must remain on premises. That is the issue. The ATF can spend all the time they want in your shop looking over your books and pretty much anything else they want to look at. Pictures? No law against that I know of. I think you should open a shop lil k and challenge the ATF at every turn. You will not have the doors open for long.

When does the bid story you broke come out over on info-wars?

Improved back ground checks is the same as the fix NICS bill and was attached to the bill House Republicans passed. Good stuff I thought.