S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (Birdog),
491
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,506
Posts545,604
Members14,419
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 371
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 371 |
Last edited by devrep; 07/25/07 02:45 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,257
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,257 |
I'll take a stab at the age. Circa 1892. LINDNER !!!!!! removed the crown from the crossed pistols in 1891 due to the new German laws. About a year was given for the dust to settle before he had a stamp that had the pistols and HAL over on that same stamp. During that time, he used two separate stamps. The pistols and then another with HAL. Looking at these pics, I think I see that the barrel stamps are not duplicates. Ken Georgi will be along to set me straight.LOL As to value---few hundreds toward the low end. I would be interested as a parts gun or might stretch to restore it out of love. It is a very low grade and never will command much. Best, John
Humble member of the League of Extraodinary Gentlemen (LEG). Joined 14 March, 2006. Member #1.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 927 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 927 Likes: 3 |
Pretty close John I would estimate the date of production of this gun at 1895 based on the serial number, where it falls amongst other Lindner-Dalys in the database, and the features of the gun. The gun is a model 155. The model 155 was one of those Daly models that only exisited for only a few years. The model 155 featured a crossbolt (vice dollshead) and ejectors. The model 155 retailed for $185 in 1895 (!) The model 155 later became the model 185. Given the poor condition and corrosion (but assuming the barrels are truly OK) I would say the value of the gun is in the $500 - $750 range - this is an ejector Lindner afterall. The problem is you will have to sink big bucks into the gun to make it right. I could hear the cash register ring as I mentally tallied the list of items that would be needed to put it right (or at least how I would want it.) Good luck, Ken
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,994 Likes: 402
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,994 Likes: 402 |
Devrep, if you pass on the old girl, could you forward the info along to me? I'm looking for a nice sxs project to build up for myself. Steve
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
I'm going to play the devils advocate here and propose the following: From what I've read so far the primary mechicanical problem is the top lever spring. If there aren't other broken parts, and the gun is still on face, and the barrels in usable condition as stated and the stock doesn't have to be replaced why not do the following: Make the mechanical repairs including fixing the buggered screws and do a surface restoration which would consist primarily of rust removal and perhaps a stock cleanup. Then use the gun as is. I agree it's a low grade but it's certainly well made if it cost $185 back then. It certainly wouldn't be a beauty queen but you'd have a 100 + year old original gun that's in shooting condition. Just my thoughts. Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1 |
I hope the "guts" don't look like those butt screws. The price of $185 in 1895 is staggering. No wonder they imported and sold so few of them. Man, nearly 30 years later Fox XE cost $185, and better looking gun too!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,522
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,522 |
Jagermeister until I shot an original Lindner I didn't understand either. Nothing is as smooth operating. If the guts aren't rust pitted this old gun would feel better than a swiss watch beyond any Fox ever built.
Is there a bulge in the left barrel just above the D in Daly or is that a photo problem?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,136 Likes: 199
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,136 Likes: 199 |
I like it, bulge and all. We haven't really seen the "bad inletting at the top tang" that would be a bad thing if it were really bad. Ken is right about what you should probably be paying for it, but it isn't an impossible or expensive restoration to shooting condition as I see it. Is that a SD&G buttplate, I can't tell.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250 |
Across the board AH Fox guns cause more excitement than Charles Daly Lindners. Perhaps reason enough for most!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,894 Likes: 110
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,894 Likes: 110 |
It appears to me that the fitting of that Linder's trigger plate and the sculpting of those breech balls took more work then went into an entire XE-Grade Ansley H. Fox!! And, I've been a Fox guy for 44 years.
|
|
|
|
|