Restraint and reason are not paramount to your vitriol
My gosh old hypocrite, you are even more stupid than I thought. Either that or dishonest. Or stupid and dishonest. Even after you dissected your nonsensical statement ALMOST word for word in yet another attempt to prove me wrong, you show us either your stupidity or your dishonesty by leaving out one little word. This time I put it in bold letters for you. It changes everything.
Your statement made absolutely no sense old hypocrite. And your explanation of it makes no sense either when you leave out a very important piece of the sentence. Maybe you ought to invest in a dictionary and a thesaurus. Did Larry Clown PM you and help you with that foolish explanation? He also has a problem admitting when he is wrong, and also used to make ever larger posts attempting to make excuses for stupid and wrong things he wrote. When that didn't work, he would cry like a baby to Dave and ask him to lock the thread. When that didn't work, he said he was ignoring me, yet still responded to my posts.
You shouldn't attempt to use such big words when you don't have the intelligence to string them together properly. And when you are clearly wrong, you should just buck up and admit it. How many hours did you struggle with your lame, incorrect, and idiotic excuse?
You are more dense than depleted uranium old hypocrite. And once again you are attempting to say that I believe things that I never claimed to believe. Are you stupid or dishonest? Of course believing in or supporting gun control is not the same as pedophilia. I never said that. I made an extreme analogy to make something very simple for you to understand. Apparently it wasn't simple enough for someone as dense as you.
Here it is in plain English. Based upon what King (and a couple others such as Ed Good) post here, it is my opinion that they are here to undermine the 2nd Amendment gun rights of law abiding U.S. citizens. My opinion of them is based solely upon the totality of their own words which they post here. Each thread is not a snapshot in time... even if it is for dense folks like you. If they did nothing but post anti-gun rhetoric and support for anti-gun politicians on this shotgun forum, they would quickly get skewered and probably banned. But they think they are clever enough to fly under the radar by occasionally pretending to be gun guys and supporters of gun rights. They typically do that when things get hot for them and an increasing number of guys began voicing displeasure with their anti-gun rhetoric. Even someone as dumb as you may have noticed that King was recently taking a greater than usual number of negative replies, even from people who would normally say nothing, as he staunchly defended and supported anti-gun Hillary Clinton, and repeatedly denigrated the pro-2nd Amendment candidate Donald Trump.
I was certain, from his past history, that he would soon post some crap to pretend that he was actually a gun guy... just as he did here and in his recent "Queen of Guns" thread.
But these Trolls always go back to posting their anti-gun rhetoric and support for anti-gunners when things cool down. So I decided a while back that if King was really proud of his anti-gun rhetoric, he wouldn't mind if I frequently reminded everyone just where he stands and remind them just what he is doing... by using his own words. Obviously, by his responses, he is anything but proud of it, and he always attempts to change the subject and shoot the messenger. I love it.
You, old hypocrite, seem to wish to give him cover under the guise of faux civility. I have explained many times why I keep King's anti-gun, anti-NRA, and anti-2nd Amendment rhetoric front and center, yet you keep saying you don't understand why I do it, or agree with it. As I said, in my opinion, that makes you either stupid or dishonest. Which is it?