S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,501
Posts545,497
Members14,414
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,755 Likes: 30
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,755 Likes: 30 |
Last edited by Brian; 06/29/07 10:33 PM.
Brian LTC, USA Ret. NRA Patron Member AHFGCA Life Member USPSA Life Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,090 Likes: 36
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,090 Likes: 36 |
Can't help but have a closeup of the forend detail you speak of?
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income. - Errol Flynn
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
After WWII both German and Austrian Gunsmiths were only allowed to work on guns owned by Allied personal. I believe that it was not until 1952 that they could own, manufacture and work on other guns. Your rifle is typical of this period in history with a high mounted scope, flat bolt and double set triggers. It’s hard to fit a set of DST’s into the Springfield triggerguard so they normally used a shotgun triggerguard but I see they managed with your rifle. These were made by any gunmaker who wanted to work in his trade. Workmanship ranges from crude to well done, yours is above average for the time. Post war West Germany with it’s ruined economy was a great place for a GI with a few dollars, large numbers of these were converted. So to answer your question your rifle was made by an unknown gunsmith in Germany post war trying to make a living as best he could. Rarely are these marked as to who did the work, some will be found marked Wiesbaden Rod & Gun Club which was run, I believe by the US Air Force. I've been there but don't remember a lot about the place.
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,189 Likes: 18
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,189 Likes: 18 |
Looks like the forearm treatment may compliment the oak leaf motif in the bottom of the grip panel, but its difficult to see in the photograph supplied.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1 |
Hand-assembled all the way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,096
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,096 |
It's a nice gun...but if you can't tell which side of the pond this gun was made on, just by looking at it...what is there to discuss?...even the bases where made on this side...not the scope and rings...but the bases...ask any experienced checkerer...look at the stock lines
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
I think MP nailed it down as good as can be.
The stock lines don't look American to me....other than the missing Schabel.....it might have took a dip in the pond and a Beaver chewed on the stock after it got here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,178 Likes: 43
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,178 Likes: 43 |
I had a similar Springfield. The stock on my gun was decidedly more Tuetonic i.e. Schnable forearm and Euro cheek. The length of pull was nearly 16"!!! The scope (in claw mounts) was Polish military.It also had double set triggers.The workmanship was average at best. No identifying marks.
Regards, Ken
Dodging lions and wasting time.....
|
|
|
|
|