April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Who's Online Now
7 members (Der Ami, Mark II, Hugh Lomas, ithaca1, 2 invisible), 984 guests, and 6 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,467
Posts545,110
Members14,409
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 11 1 2 3 4 10 11
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Originally Posted By: Stan
Originally Posted By: treblig1958
I just don't understand why they max out these tungsten loads like this. Tungsten will kill just fine using pressures developed by the old lead waterfowl loads. Steel and bismuth need all they help they can get but not tungsten.


They are not marketing them for the few of us who shoot vintage doubles at ducks. They are trying to reach "the masses', who shoot ducks with gas operated jammamatics that need high pressures to to work reliably. Pressure is not the same as velocity. You can get velocity without extreme pressures. Velocity X mass, with enough density in the pattern, is what kills ducks. Pressure is meaningless as far as killing goes.

SRH



The old lead loads killed ducks and geese just fine without this massive loading creating all this chamber pressure. All I'm saying is create another line for the tungsten that replicates these older lead shells because there are a whole lot of guys out there with not only older doubles but also the older pump guns who would like to do some hunting.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Great to see you posting Dr. Hause!!! Always great information. smile

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,149
Likes: 1147
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,149
Likes: 1147
Originally Posted By: treblig1958
Originally Posted By: Stan
Originally Posted By: treblig1958
I just don't understand why they max out these tungsten loads like this. Tungsten will kill just fine using pressures developed by the old lead waterfowl loads. Steel and bismuth need all they help they can get but not tungsten.


They are not marketing them for the few of us who shoot vintage doubles at ducks. They are trying to reach "the masses', who shoot ducks with gas operated jammamatics that need high pressures to to work reliably. Pressure is not the same as velocity. You can get velocity without extreme pressures. Velocity X mass, with enough density in the pattern, is what kills ducks. Pressure is meaningless as far as killing goes.

SRH



The old lead loads killed ducks and geese just fine without this massive loading creating all this chamber pressure. All I'm saying is create another line for the tungsten that replicates these older lead shells because there are a whole lot of guys out there with not only older doubles but also the older pump guns who would like to do some hunting.



treblig,

I'm not sure you know just how high the pressures were on the "old lead loads".

SRH


May God bless America and those who defend her.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
They were that high??? I guess I didn't know.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Originally Posted By: Drew Hause
The original 1922/1923 Western Cartridge Co. 12g 'Super-X Field', Peters Cartridge Company's 'High Velocity', United States Cartridge's 'Ajax Heavies Long-Range', and Remington's Kleanbore 'Nitro Express Extra Long Range' loads were all 2 3/4 inch, 1 1/4 oz., 3 3/4 Dram Eq. (1330 fps).

Split down the middle NID




Can we dig up the chamber pressures these 1922/1923 loads were generating??

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 313
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 313
In a 1927 Western Cartridge Co. flyer "Super-X The Long Range Load" by Capt. Chas. Askins, the 12g. duck load is described as 1 1/4 oz. with 38 1/2 grains or 3 1/2 dram DuPont Oval with a muzzle velocity of 1400 fps and a breech pressure of 3 3/4 tons or 11,480 psi; just below the current SAAMI 12g maximum of 11,500 psi.

From “Smokeless Shotgun Powders: Their Development, Composition and Ballistic Characteristics” by Wallace H Coxe; E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 1927, a DuPont Oval Pamphlet, p.20.
The original 1922 Western Cartridge Co. 12g ‘Super-X Field’ (loaded with DuPont Oval), and 1923 Peters Cartridge Co. ‘High Velocity’, United States Cartridge ‘Ajax Heavies Long-Range’, and Remington Kleanbore ‘Nitro Express Extra Long Range’ loads were all 2 3/4”, 1 1/4 oz., 3 3/4 Dr. Eq. (1330 fps).

Dram Eq. is listed as 3 but has to be 3 3/4 compared to other pressure graphs.
Charge was 1 1/4 oz. Pressure is expressed in Long Tons.



Using the estimated Tons Lead Crusher Pressure (Cp) conversion to PSI (pound force per square inch) (Cp x 1.5) - .5 = TSI, TSI X 2240 = PSI.

"Ballistite" Dense maximum pressure at 1” was 4.9 Long Tons = 15,344 psi
"Schultze" at 1 3/4” was 4.5 Long Tons = 14,000 psi
DuPont Bulk at 1 2/3” was 4.1 Long Tons = 12,656 psi
FFFg at 1 1/2” was 3.8 Long Tons = 11,648 psi
Oval at 2” was 3.5 Long Tons = 10,640 psi

A DuPont loading manual from the 1960s listed DuPont Bulk:
3 1/2 Dr. Eq. with 1 1/8 oz. shot at 10,000 psi + 10-14% by modern piezo transducers
3 1/5 (3.20) Dr. Eq. with 1 1/4 oz. shot at 9,900 psi

In the 1928 edition of "Smokeless Shotgun Powders", Coxe reported 3 1/2 Dram Eq. 1 1/4 oz. loads:
DuPont Bulk smokeless powder - 11,700 psi by LUP
Schultze Bulk smokeless powder - 11,800 psi
28 grains of Ballistite - 12,600 psi
40 grains of DuPont Oval Progressive Burning powder - 9,400 psi

I have no data for Western's 3 inch 'Record' with 1 3/8 oz. of shot released in 1924; U.S. Cartridge Co. 'Climax Heavies' was introduced in 1927.

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Basically equaling or exceeding Kent's TM loads of today. Interesting.

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,718
Likes: 479
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,718
Likes: 479
A large diet of heavy loads can cause any stock to fail long term. From a safety stand point I think that we all mostly agree a Sterlingworth and NID are very much capable of handling a load in the 9,500-10,000 psi. The action is strong and the barrels are robust. It is the wood that might be in question and unless you are looking to shoot huge numbers of heavy shells it should stand up to moderate use. And if the stock cracks there are thousands of Sterlingworths and NIDs to take their place. We are talking about a basic, heavy duty, American field grade gun not a light weight British gun meant to shoot one ounce loads. So enjoy it and put it to work.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,149
Likes: 1147
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,149
Likes: 1147
Originally Posted By: treblig1958
They were that high??? I guess I didn't know.


Evidently.

SRH


May God bless America and those who defend her.
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Granted this is a double gun forum but there are plenty of old pumps and autoloaders approaching or exceeding that century mark also.

If I were to buy an old double for waterfowl then why not restock it in plain jane walnut.

That would be your dedicated waterfowl gun or whatever.

Page 2 of 11 1 2 3 4 10 11

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.088s Queries: 36 (0.068s) Memory: 0.8598 MB (Peak: 1.8988 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-25 19:30:37 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS