doublegunshop.com - home Forums Is KING BROWN an Anti-Gunner?

Chalk up another King Brown lie. The Patriot Act has been criticized numerous times here. Just last week, I mentioned my belief that when Iran gets Nukes and uses them, the result will be another over-reaction like the Patriot Act, and the ultimate blame for it will be the Neville Chamberlain-like Kerry, Obama, and all the Libtards who support them.

But how about starting a new thread with your lies King. This one is about your anti-gun beliefs.

Members will note, from Wikipedia, of an action 14 years ago, when I posted of American complacency over intrusive security over-reaction, not something last week:

"The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. Its title is a ten-letter backronym (USA PATRIOT) that stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001".

Yup, we don't have a large percentage of blacks, although up here, in Toronto, they account for a hugely disproportionate amount of the gun crimes. We managed to wholesale import the criminal culture from Jamaica. Good old multiculturalism. Good old liberals. Thanks for that, fellas!

In the meantime we are doing our best to create our own homegrown racial divide. In 1996 natives represented 2.6 percent of Canada's population. It's now 5%. Increasingly they migrate to large cities, particularly in western Canada. And the cities they go to constantly vie for the title of murder capital of Canada. Winnipeg, Saskatoon, Regina, Edmonton, and a host of smaller ones have to try to deal with the plague of Indian gangs, doing their best to replicate the criminality of the latino gangs of SoCal.

King, you are often too smug about Canada, too proud of our past. The Undiscovered Country of Canada's future will likely be marred by ever increasing amounts of race based violence and criminality. And I put the blame for that future on the indiscriminate vote buying efforts of the Liberal Party of Canada and their immigration policies and politically correct and functionally destructive policies towards Native Canadians.

The Liberal Party was the dominate national political force in the post war era until 2006 and our Liberal Prime Ministers Mackenzie King, Louis St Laurent, Lester Pearson, Pierre Trudeau and Jean Chretien enacted legislation that encouraged and presided over a remarkable shift in what it meant to be Canadian.

The ideal Canadian of today is PC, dependent on the government to regulate most aspects of his life, mealy mouthed on world issues with pretenses of being important on the world stage. Little I can find to be proud of in the attributes of the modern Liberal and NDP voting Canadian.

And it looks likely it will be from that group that our next elected dictator will be drawn.

We? 'You' get to talk about social justice and redistribution any time you want. Me, I'm on pins-n-needles with all the censorship now a days.

I did ping Dave though about your typo. Awe just kidding, you can log back on. He's a 'soon to be' billionaire. The time requirements of maintaining ones golf game as prez will keep the divide within sight until early '17. Can we come together and sing a round of 'Sanford and Son'.

Members will note that there are no members here. There is no membership requirement to post on threads here, and there are merely voluntary contributions to help keep this site running. How much have you contributed King?

Non-members will also note that I said the Patriot Act has been criticized here many times. It has been discussed many times. King Brown is telling another lie when he claims he has pointed it out to us, and nobody uttered a word of disapproval. My comment last week was simply another in a long series of comments.

But King Brown only sees what he wants to see, and is often in total denial of reality and the truth. I'm not sure if this is due to dimentia, or if King has always been this dishonest. I suspect the latter.

You won't get me to bite on the wooing of the ethnic vote by the Liberals. That role now has been perfected and surpassed by the Conservatives under the consummate leadership of Jason Kenny. It's great either way, James---we need immigrants---and the diversity will be a challenge of our citizenship. My single caveat to your post is its partisanship.

You disappoint in the way you attribute blame solely to the NDP and Liberals, considering the Conservative performance the last seven years, your prophecy of its defeat notwithstanding. Our dictator has been on the wrong side of every issue: jobs, the economy, the military, immigration, the environment etc.

Canadians are proud of their past for good reasons. Our prime minister of an acknowledged one-man government---and I hold him responsible for Canada losing its influence on the world stage, not his party for allowing him to do it---is denounced daily by the Conservative party's reliable election endorser and national newspaper of record, the Globe and Mail.

I don't think we're all that far apart about Stephen Harper.

We might as well sing anything we please, for the time we're allowed to do it. Every single piece of federal government information goes through the Prime Minister's Office in Ottawa. The PMO distributes lies, involves itself in scandalous spin, edits and deletes, fires public servants who criticize public policy.

King, undoing years of liberal "santa clause "leadership takes time conservatives make hard choices, austerity to put the country back on sound footing. your socialist leanings put blame on anything that will not walk in lock step with your out of touch beliefs.we have one canadian who is telling us what is in the news everyday,another canadian blaming changes to put the country on a sound footing for the future.and if you hold one man responsible for your govt failings you don't have much of a govt.we had obomma and the dem house and senate making disastrous decisions for our country.house and senate are back in reps hands now we need to elect a conservative president.

King, I'll respond this evening when I'm safely ensconced on an island in Georgian Bay.

"the national newspaper of record" is on globe and mail masthead.its not an actual fact,and with the internet its importance is more limited.