|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
4 members (SKB, LGF, 2 invisible),
689
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,506
Posts545,604
Members14,419
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 15,456 Likes: 86 |
The Book of keith aka keiths Book of Sleaze-ball Doublegun Forum Tactics.
Chapter One Stalk target throughout the board. Pestilence is the eternal price of vigilance. Or is it the other way around?
Chapter 4no insult is too vile. Before moving to the zingers, condition readers with low-grade insults such as dumbass, assh*le (use asterisk so that no one can say you meant to use a distasteful term), stupid. This technique worked in the third grade and was never outgrown. Why give it up now? Always, always act like you are the smartest person in the room. Calling someone a dumbass or stupid automatically makes you a superior intellect. Ask any third grader.
Chapter 5mix in insults with direct or indirect homosexual innuendo but give yourself enough wiggle room so that you can act indignant if someone calls you on it.
Chapter 6mine the forum for past statements, quote them out of context, for a phony aha, gotcha moment.
Chapter 7. Never underestimate the use of exaggeration.
Chapter 13. Never lose sight of the fact that the insult and demonization are far more important than the message sought to be advanced.
Chapter 1...4...5...6...7...13 are from the GLS book
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862 |
Ken61, yes, I agree completely, but even now, I'm not sure King really understands what it means when you refer to him as Statist/Religious. Do you recall how many times he thought you were trying to say he was religious in the sense of worshipping a Supreme Being?
We all know he is a Sociopath, but some here like GLS and Rocky Mtn Bill Ferguson defend that.
As I mentioned before, I don't post for Comrade King's benefit. (or other's of the same religion) I post to provide an intellectual analysis, refutation and rebuttal to his sociopathic, statist religious beliefs. I post so other's can understand the philosophy behind his posts, in order for them to be intellectually objective, rather than fall prey to his psychopolitical indoctrination attempts.
Last edited by Ken61; 12/17/14 06:49 PM.
I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390 |
Of course he would like to poison me jOe... because he can't simply go back to King's lies that I confronted on page 5 of this thread, which started this current fray, and show anyone where King was right and I was wrong.
Any idiot can see through this... which explains why rocky mtn bill can't see through this.
Birds of a feather...
GLS, your pal King is still a liar. And if it makes you feel any better, he is also a Religious/Statist/Sociopath... and a lib... and a Libtard... and an anti-2nd Amendment Socialist who supports and defends the anti-gun Leftist Democrats who continually work to infringe upon our Civil 2nd Amendment Rights.
Apparently, that's OK with you. And it's OK for you to pick and choose your targets for derision. You can always blame it on the mercury exposure you got when you did the partial clean-up in the house you sold.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390 |
As I mentioned before, I don't post for Comrade King's benefit. (or other's of the same religion) I post to provide an intellectual analysis, refutation and rebuttal to his sociopathic, statist religious beliefs. I post so other's can understand the philosophy behind his posts, in order for them to intellectually objective, rather than fall prey to his psychopolitical indoctrination attempts. Thanks Ken61. I do appreciate it too, because it's helpful to have King's philosophy seen from a different perspective. Excellent observation, by the way, that King's posts are psychopolitical indocrtination attempts, rather than honest rational discussion. By another name, they are Leftist Propaganda, with a little faux civility sugar coating, and some resume inflation to add an air of credibility...nothing more. The drumbeat continues long after you, I, craigd, DaveK, Jim, Doug, or anyone shows it is incorrect, insane, or unconstitutional. Like any good Propagandist, King simply keeps repeating his lies... even when caught RED handed, no pun intended. Most others of the same religion are simply too ignorant to grasp that, so they are reduced to "shoot the messenger" attacks without anything rational enough to refute the message.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862 |
Your reference to Tea Party is interesting, Ken. I looked at recent Mike Tanner article at National Review Online titled Why the Tea Party is Waning, not winning. Excerpt:
"As the Tea Party celebrates its five-year anniversary, many commentators are asking whether the grassroots antiBig Government movement is still relevant.
"In some ways, this seems a silly question. The Tea Party has been enormously successful in changing the terms of the national debate on issues such as debt and spending. And, while its favored candidates have suffered some high-profile defeats, it has also won important victories. The Republican midterm sweep of 2010 would not have been possible without its energy and enthusiasm.
"Yet its also true that the Tea Partys clout is waning. According to the most recent Gallup poll, just 30 percent of Americans have a favorable opinion of the movement, the lowest level in its history. This seems particularly unsettling when polls also show that the public still overwhelmingly supports the Tea Party objective of limited government. In fact, a recent Gallup poll shows a record 72 percent of Americans feels that big government is the greatest threat to the future of the country. Voters who feel that way should be flocking to the Tea Party in droves.They are not.
"Some of it might be a question of tactics. Americans tend to dislike confrontation from their political leaders. Certainly, things like the government shutdown tended to turn off some voters, especially when misrepresented by a biased media. The overheated rhetoric of some tea-party leaders may also drive away otherwise sympathetic voters. Calling every dissenting Republican a RINO or inferring that President Obama is some sort of crypto-Muslim Communist is not going to win friends or influence people. Some tea-party activists definitely come
across as a bit over-caffeinated."
Labelling, Ken, often is a bad fit, counterproductive, as we see on Misfires. Comrade King, I'm not sure if you understand the nature of the Tea Party. It's a grass-roots movement created as a reaction to massive oppression by sociopathic, religious statists. It is decentralized in nature, but that's not to say that some individuals have attempted to take some aspect of control and to attempt to assume credit for it's creation. It is the overall ethos that is important, not what happens to individual, self-identified Tea Party groups. It that context, the cited article has very limited relevance. Much of what I've seen is that the various Tea Party organizations have provided structure for those newly awakened individuals to identify with. Once familiar with the concept of Constitutional Freedom and Equality, social groups become less important and individualism is easily asserted. This is hard for religious statists to understand, as adherence to their sociopathic faith-based dogma is paramount. This applies to all sub-cults of religious statism, with deviation from that dogma being grounds for bigoted, religious demonization. The sociopathic, religious statists may have had some success in their bigoted demonization of the name "Tea Party", but the awareness and realizations behind it's creation remain. The philosophy that caused the Tea Party's creation is alive, well, and growing as more individuals understand what is happening to our individual freedom and liberty.
I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,344 Likes: 390 |
Your reference to Tea Party is interesting, Ken. I looked at recent Mike Tanner article at National Review Online titled Why the Tea Party is Waning, not winning.
Labelling, Ken, often is a bad fit, counterproductive, as we see on Misfires. Interesting. This begs the question of why King was never once critical of the labeling of the TEA Party by radical Left Wing Liberal DNC activists, MSNBC, the Liberal press, and other Libtards, including King himself. The TEA Party was inaccurately lumped in with racists, misogynists, extreme Right wing militia types, and every negative stereotype you can think of in order to demonize a citizens group that merely wanted limited government, lower taxes, and reduced deficits and debt. Obviously they, the Libtards and other Propagandists like King, did a fairly good job, and frightened RINO's like John Boehner. But as Ken61 states, the sentiment is still strong, and that is evidenced by the recent mid-terms. What King is really trying to say is that labeling is only counterproductive when he and his fellow Leftists are not the ones doing it. I think that's what rocky mtn bill was trying to say last night as well. By the way, where'd you go rocky mtn bill? Are you just a one trick pony whose only trick is to eat taxpayer subsidized oats and then shit them out on the floor? You sure didn't earn that teacher's salary by displaying brilliance like you did last night.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1 |
Most tea party members are not bad people. I know one of them and he is only little bit paranoid.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,084 Likes: 476
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,084 Likes: 476 |
I use an asterick when I call people like you an assh*le because it comes up as [censored] otherwise. Dumbass does not come out as [censored]. I want everyone to know that in my opinion, you are an assh*le. You gotta be an assh*le to sell a house with mercury contamination, and then admit to such sleazy behavior on the internet.
You are very helpful. Despite your numerous qualifications, I don't routinely refer to other folks on this forum as "assh*les". I wasn't aware of the automatic censor. You are a constant source of practical information and not just ill will. BTW, it's asterisk, not asterick. But then someone as brilliant as you think you are would have known this. What a burden it must be always being the smartest person in your head. You would have loved living in my old home. For some reason, it doesn't have an insect problem. It may become available again when the present owners are taken off of life support and once the house is no longer a Super Fund site. I'll have the funeral director call you. Never did catch your name and address. I would like to send you a Chrismas Card.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,862 |
Most tea party members are not bad people. I know one of them and he is only little bit paranoid. Most statist, religious sociopaths are not bad people. I know one of them and he is only a little bit sociopathic. Want to know the difference? Paranoid Tea Party members are not trying to sociopathically and unconstitutionally inflict their faith-based beliefs on others. In fact, they're rejecting the infliction by the statists, and the best way to be hated by a sociopath is to refuse to be their "Willing Victim". That's why they're considered EVIL..
Last edited by Ken61; 12/17/14 09:19 PM.
I prefer wood to plastic, leather to nylon, waxed cotton to Gore-Tex, and split bamboo to graphite.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350 |
I'll take your word that the Tea Party's overall ethos is more important than the numbers, and that for all the demonization of the party "the awareness and realizations behind its creation remain." It's philosophy is alive and growing as people understand what is happening to their freedom and liberty.
Nothing could be clearer: the Tea Party's philosophy and ethos is alive and well. You don't contradict findings of the excerpt above that the Tea Party's clout is waning, at its lowest level, by NRO, which receives more hits per day than all the other conservative-magazine websites combined.
|
|
|
|
|
