doublegunshop.com - home Forums Is KING BROWN an Anti-Gunner?

I agree, Stan really hit the nail on the head with the "fishing" term, and your putting him on ignore is a smart move CB.
The internet now has pages and pages of his posts-hopefully some new collectors will take the time to research him before handing over money on crap.
I am as well and done falling for the bait,he will be gone in a day or two if he gets NO replies.

Lets hope others join in as well.

here is the link to page with Stans well done post !

(http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=264363&page=9.

On todays Drudge;

Detroit police chief gives credit to armed citizens for drop in crime

From The Detroit News: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140716/METRO01/307160034#ixzz37jt5FWGS

Detroit has experienced 37 percent fewer robberies in 2014 than during the same period last year, 22 percent fewer break-ins of businesses and homes, and 30 percent fewer carjackings. Craig attributed the drop to better police work and criminals being reluctant to prey on citizens who may be carrying guns.

�Criminals are getting the message that good Detroiters are armed and will use that weapon,� said Craig, who has repeatedly said he believes armed citizens deter crime. �I don�t want to take away from the good work our investigators are doing, but I think part of the drop in crime, and robberies in particular, is because criminals are thinking twice that citizens could be armed.

King, I said noting of the sort. what I said was:
"I would disagree. It would be a very bad idea to allow any municipality, county, or state to decide on our constitutional rights . Read that plural. Not just about guns. Towns, cities etc. deciding what is appropriate to read or say? I think not. Constitutional rights are rights we enjoy regardless of state boundaries.

I was talking about constitutional rights as a whole , not any one in particular. The way I see it, this administration is not just going after the 2nd amendment. They have shredded the Constitution and are now burning the little pieces. Noting about just a federal law for guns. The courts have ruled on the 2nd and my point is that we do not stand by and allow the abrogation of our constitutional rights.

Here is a liberal/yes liberal Constitutional lawyer on Obama and his ,unconstitutional expansion of presidential powers :

Thanks for that; I should not have relied on memory before posting. But pretty close: many jurisdictions arbitrating and making it stick on constitutional rights. Constitutional civil rights were enforced some 50 years at the point of a gun, blithely neglected from Day One because the majority didn't have its heart in extending same rights to blacks and whites. Supreme Court ruled against Guantanamo but still no change. Roe vs Wade wrangling continues to this day.

Your point is to stop "abrogation of constitutional rights." How would you do it when all high offices derive their legitimacy from the will of the people as expressed in elections? One size never fits all. Dave's New Hampshire has comparatively few gun restrictions; your New York considerably more. How do you balance the interests? Different strokes for different folks? Countries differ from when constitutions were written, and are amended all the time.

Maybe he's saying that there is a real problem within these communitites that have nothing to do with our Second Amendment rights. These problems only became as bad as they are as a direct result of the Great Society, Liberalism, and the Welfare State. Illigitimacy rose, as people became slaves on the Democrat Plantation. Mothers have multiple kids with multiple fathers who are not involved. Discipline and parental supervision has given us a generation of kids having babies, and kids with no moral compass. God forbid that the schools teach them right from wrong or enforce discipline. School prayer is a complete no-no.

It isn't law abiding gun-owners who did all those shootings in Chicago, and continue to do it in every big city that already has extremely restrictive gun laws. But it's law abiding gun-owners who guys like you and King think should give up more rights.

Didn't King just allude above, as Liberals are so fond of doing... that our Constitution is a living document, and the country has changed since it was written, so then, the Constitution must be changed or ammended in order to address current trends and problems???... even if those problems were created by Libtards?

You and King both know where the real problem is, but you and King will never admit it. That's how dishonest people with a dishonest agenda operate. I recently provided King with statistics on murder and violent crime rates for the U.S. and the rest of the world. There are many many countries far more violent than the U.S. including Greenland with a murder rate four times as high. I'd venture to say that if we shipped all of our black and hispanic gangbangers to Canadian cities, the murder and violent crime rates would spike there and fall dramatically here in spite of any gun laws in either country. Or maybe Canadian lawmakers would quickly notice that the problem was something other than fear of inanimate objects. Maybe they'd stop giving parole and probation to violent offenders and just lock them up and throw away the key. Much cheaper for society in the long run. But Liberals like King would cry bloody murder and wring their hands about racism and profiling, even when it became apparent that it was working... just as they have done here.

It's still abundantly clear that King wishes to carry the anti-gun/anti Second Amendment/anti-NRA message while pretending that he is on our side and only reporting the news. Well, we see dishonest and biased Liberal journalism all the time here... and King makes excuses for that too. Actions speak louder than words and dishonesty still isn't civility. It's not working King. The Emperor has no clothes and everyone here now knows it except for ed and Jagermeister. Get used to the new normal. More proof to support my opinion of your anti-Second Amendment behaviors to follow...

much bloviation here today, eh what?

ed is now officially on my ignore list. It's the first time in my years on many forums that I've had to do this but enough is enough.

Haha, now that I've actually done it, I see I can't completely ignore old Ed. Where his comments are in each post, it now tells me I am ignoring him.

Anyone else see the irony in this. Lol

I sure do canvas.

It also says that I can "toggle" the post. I won't do that though because with my luck ed's posts will be back on my screen and they will be like some rare kind of venerial disease that you can't get rid of.