doublegunshop.com - home Forums Is KING BROWN an Anti-Gunner?

Posting dimensions of US religious is not demonizing and bigotry, any more than if I had written that Americans only accepted 50-some years ago that a Catholic could be president and not accept his orders from the pope. Unusual to say the least but hardly bigotry and demonizing. Facts. Get a grip.

Comrade King, you miss my point.

You equated faith-based beliefs to anti-intellectualism. Which of course THEY ARE, that's why it's called "Faith". The difference is whether or not they are sociopathically inflicted upon others against their will. They one's you cited are not, the one's you hold certainly are. So, you're truly the anti-intellectual, unconstitutional, religious, BIGOT.

One of the biggest statist religious sociopathic scams going on is man-made global warming, based on CO2 carbon-forcing mythology. Despite being constantly scientifically refuted, the statists continue to spread the myth, and won't even try to discuss the science. Typical sociopathic religious reaction. Demonize the evil nonbelievers!

Squeal away, you little statist religious bigot, you...

brian: alas, also, notice that when one takes exception with the narrow views of some here, instead of responding with civil discourse, one is instead subjected to grade school yard name calling and bullying, including the vilest of innuendo, such as that above posted by ken against king...childish and disappointing that supposed adults conduct themselves in such a juvenile uncivil manner...here.

an brian, by the way, I don't really know or care what they are talking about...but, its ken's tone that is so disturbing to me...how do you have civil discourse with that?

there seem to be few gentle men left here.

Ed, you're funny.

My posts are a reaction against those whose beliefs deprive their fellow citizens of their constitutionally protected Freedom, Liberty, and Equality. Of course I react forcefully, as well as intellectually. If that disturbs you, I suggest you "grow up" and take responsibility for your actions and views. If you profess views that are inflictive upon others, you should expect a philosophical smack-down. Stop sniveling. Man-up, Buck-up, and attempt to take it like a Man.

Funny thing to me. He has a three in a row running conversation with himself, and he's not all that civil. Then he edits a couple of his comments, yup that helped a bunch.

In the words of pitchman Ron Popeil, "Wait, there's more!"

In this case, it's more anti-Second Amendment lies and bullshit from King Brown:



Want to hear what Mark Levin really has to say about the meaning and purpose of the Second Amendment? Take 5 minutes to listen to this:

http://therightscoop.com/mark-levin-the-...cal-government/

Of course, Mr. Levin realizes that the individual right to bear arms and the right of self defense are merely affirmed by the 2nd Amendment, but granted by the God that King does not believe in.

And Justice John Paul Stevens? Again we have King dishonestly attempting to characterize another Justice as a Conservative when it is well known that he was another major disappointment to Conservatives and the President who nominated him. He turned quite Liberal and most often sided with the Liberal Left wing of the Court, reaffirming Roe v. Wade and strongly supporting affirmative action. Stevens was not asked about Roe v. Wade at his confirmation hearings, so it is unknown how he felt on that when appointed.

Stevens voted with the Liberal Left minority in both Heller and McDonald. Now retired, he is preaching for a rewrite of the Second Amendment and strongly believes that the decisions in Heller and McDonald were wrong. Steven wants to add five words to the Second Amendment... the right of the People to keep and bear arms when serving in the militia shall not be infringed. Of course, the Liberal Left will insist that there no longer is a Militia... thus, the Constitutional RKBA is obsolete. Little steps. Lies, and chipping away at it. That's the plan. And little foot-soldiers like King and ed are right here trying to make it happen.

But this illustrates King Brown's frequent dishonesty. It kind of reminds us of how OWD (Obsessed With Doubles) attempted to deceive us about Justice Elena Kagan's anti-gun fervor when she was nominated. Our anti-Second Amendment Liberals just say anything and hope that no one checks the facts. The ends justify the means, and lies and deception are just part of the game.

Then there's ed and Jagermeister who, even after all of this, will still say there are no anti-Second Amendment guys here. They would stand by their Libtard friend if we had a video of King pouring gasoline on the Constitution and setting it ablaze.

Stay tuned... there's lots more!

jager: well, now there are three of us anti gunners...welcome to this exclusive club...

ed, are you really going to deny that you have many times called for restrictions on semi-autos and high capacity magazines such as Jagermeisters AKM with his 30 rd. mags.? And didn't you also say you are concerned about the large number of guns in the U.S.? And didn't you question the definition of "arms" in the Second Amendment and say that "arms" did not mean firearms... and that the only arms covered would be .69 and .75 cal. muskets? (That's one part you edited out, but we remember) How about the Militia ed? Haven't you been dissecting the Militia of the Second Amendment looking for some way to say it no longer exists... even though the Supreme Court recognizes it and a pre-existing individual right to bear arms for both personal and national defense?





Are you either that dishonest or are you that stupid that you don't even know or remember what you post here? Skim over your posts in this thread and show us where I'm wrong.

I didn't call Jagermeister an anti-gunner ed. But he too would have to be either dishonest or very stupid to not see the anti-Second Amendment beliefs that you, King, and several other trolls ascribe to. And King too... there's another honest Boy Scout who claims he has never seen an anti-gun guy anywhere on this Forum.

So just what do you call a liar?

I don't expect you to answer this ed. I just wanted to show folks how dishonest or mentally ill you and your fellow anti-gunners are.