|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
3 members (DSchrank, PALUNC, 1 invisible),
501
guests, and
2
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,542
Posts546,070
Members14,420
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,346 Likes: 391
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,346 Likes: 391 |
The story touches on the ambivalence of right and wrongs of both sides, and said the standoff was only another "trampling" incursion on Second Amendment endemic across the country (which I have mentioned here many times in spite of notions of inalienable rights).
King, are you really that stupid? We were granted an "Inalienable Right" to self defense by God which was enumerated in our Constitution as the right to keep and bear arms. No one said there have not been incursions on these rights. We talk about them all the time. You Canadians had that same right to self defense also given by God, but you didn't place it in your Constitution. The results are obvious. No Canadian Supreme Court will affirm such a right because it does not exist, so you will feed upon the crumbs your politicians drop for you. The fickle whims of the winds of change will create your destiny as to what class of guns you may own. Wherever we find these incursions on our 2nd Amendment, we find folks just like you. They are caused by folks just like you. They are made into laws by Liberal Democrat politicians who were elected to office by folks just like you. You are no help to us or our 2nd Amendment. You are the problem we face every day. You LULL and lie and promote complacency among gun owners which leads to more incursions and more erosions of our rights. You ignore the facts about firearms ownership, and you totally ignore who and what group has been the most irresponsible with firearms. Hint, it ain't Mormons or Japanese students who are doing drive-bys and gang initiation killings. But your lips are sealed when it comes to reporting which ethnic group, per capita, is most responsible for violent crime. Now, once again, please tell us what you personally have done to advance the cause of Gun Rights in Canada. Proof please! And tell us why you expend so much time and effort here using our First Amendment in order to weaken our Second Amendment.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,618 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,618 Likes: 7 |
Well you took them in the 1770-80s didn't you !  God Bless Canada !
Mine's a tale that can't be told, my freedom I hold dear.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350 |
It's quite a story, postoak. By 1783 the loyalists established a new community of Shelburne here in Nova Scotia with a population of 17,000, the fourth largest city in North America. Blacks who had escaped slavery came with them and settled in nearby Birchtown, North America's largest free Black settlement.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,346 Likes: 391
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,346 Likes: 391 |
The Burger King Credo: When you've got nothing to defend your position... pretend to ignore dissent, and move on.
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,346 Likes: 391
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,346 Likes: 391 |
The story touches on the ambivalence of right and wrongs of both sides, and said the standoff was only another "trampling" incursion on Second Amendment endemic across the country (which I have mentioned here many times in spite of notions of inalienable rights).
King, are you really that stupid? We were granted an "Inalienable Right" to self defense by God which was enumerated in our Constitution as the right to keep and bear arms. No one said there have not been incursions on these rights. We talk about them all the time. You Canadians had that same right to self defense also given by God, but you didn't place it in your Constitution. The results are obvious. No Canadian Supreme Court will affirm such a right because it does not exist, so you will feed upon the crumbs your politicians drop for you. The fickle whims of the winds of change will create your destiny as to what class of guns you may own. Wherever we find these incursions on our 2nd Amendment, we find folks just like you. They are caused by folks just like you. They are made into laws by Liberal Democrat politicians who were elected to office by folks just like you. You are no help to us or our 2nd Amendment. You are the problem we face every day. You LULL and lie and promote complacency among gun owners which leads to more incursions and more erosions of our rights. You ignore the facts about firearms ownership, and you totally ignore who and what group has been the most irresponsible with firearms. Hint, it ain't Mormons or Japanese students who are doing drive-bys and gang initiation killings. But your lips are sealed when it comes to reporting which ethnic group, per capita, is most responsible for violent crime. Now, once again, please tell us what you personally have done to advance the cause of Gun Rights in Canada. Proof please! And tell us why you expend so much time and effort here using our First Amendment in order to weaken our Second Amendment. Here it is again King... in case you missed it. Hahaha!
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,769 Likes: 757
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,769 Likes: 757 |
Well, it would seem that once slimy harry reid's name came up as the chief instigator, the DNC controled news media found other things to talk about.
Imagine that. No news is good news, right?
Best,
Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 890
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 890 |
The head of the BLM is Neil Kornze, formerly Senior Policy Advisor to Harry Reid and a major figure in the Western Solar Plan. He became BLM head March 1, 2013 after recommendation and strong urging by Harry Reid.(all this is on the BLM website) The corruption in this case goes all the way down to the county commissioners and sheriff. Hasn't been on the news yet, but Saturday, agents of the U.S. Forest Service knocked on the door of a southwest New Mexico ranch and ordered the owners to remove their possessions and livestock as the ranch now belonged to the Forest Service. Land grab is easy in cases like this....keep increasing the rules, regulations, and restrictions until the people using the land(for generations and generations) can no longer possibly adhere to them. Then, under the law, confiscate(steal)the land for political cronyism. Ranchers and farmers tend to be conservative in their viewpoints, thus being the opposition in the eyes of the current administration who believes in paybacks. Al Sharpton,the race hustler with the imaginary seminary degree,still owes 2.5 million dollars to the IRS...no agents have shown up at his place confiscating possessions.
Last edited by GaryW; 04/14/14 01:05 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015 |
Harry Reid has long history of corruption even going back to his day on the casino commission in Vegas. Here are some more of his crooked land deals: "How did Harry Reid get rich http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/314025/how-did-harry-reid-get-rich-betsy-woodruffIn 2004, the senator made $700,000 off a land deal that was, to say the least, unorthodox. It started in 1998 when he bought a parcel of land with attorney Jay Brown, a close friend whose name has surfaced multiple times in organized-crime investigations and whom one retired FBI agent described as “always a person of interest.” Three years after the purchase, Reid transferred his portion of the property to Patrick Lane LLC, a holding company Brown controlled. But Reid kept putting the property on his financial disclosures, and when the company sold it in 2004, he profited from the deal — a deal on land that he didn’t technically own and that had nearly tripled in value in six years.Here’s another example: The Los Angeles Times reported in November 2006 that when Reid became Senate majority leader he committed to making earmark reform a priority, saying he’d work to keep congressmen from using federal dollars for pet projects in their districts. It was a good idea but an odd one for the senator to espouse. He had managed to get $18 million set aside to build a bridge across the Colorado River between Laughlin, Nev., and Bullhead City, Ariz., a project that wasn’t a priority for either state’s transportation agency. His ownership of 160 acres of land nearby that stood to appreciate considerably from the project had nothing to do with the decision, according to one of his aides. The property’s value has varied since then. On his financial-disclosure forms from 2006, it was valued at $250,000 to $500,000. Open Secrets now lists it as his most valuable asset, worth $1 million to $5 million as of 2010. How Reid acquired that land is interesting, too. He put $10,000 into a pension fund his friend Clair Haycock controlled, to take over the 160-acre parcel at a price far below its assessed value. Six months later, Reid introduced legislation that would help Haycock’s industry, a move many observers said appeared to be a quid pro quo, though Reid and Haycock denied that the legislation was the result of a property deal.
Hillary For Prison 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,181 Likes: 1161
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,181 Likes: 1161 |
The story touches on the ambivalence of right and wrongs of both sides, and said the standoff was only another "trampling" incursion on Second Amendment endemic across the country (which I have mentioned here many times in spite of notions of inalienable rights).
We were granted an "Inalienable Right" to self defense by God which was enumerated in our Constitution as the right to keep and bear arms. You Canadians had that same right to self defense also given by God, but you didn't place it in your Constitution. keith, You must keep reminding yourself that in order for someone to believe in these God granted rights, as you and I do, they must first believe IN the one true God. King has repeatedly stated his atheistic beliefs. SRH
Last edited by Stan; 04/14/14 09:48 PM.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
The Militia all grouped in prayer before this was finalized and looking grim was the most telling moment of this episode for me.
Naturally you'll only see this video on FOX News.
Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
|
