OK, so here we were at a local gun board, doing nothing, just talking about a Lebeau-Courally model Prince Courakine (Sp?) which someone put up for sale. Here's a pic.
As you can see, it has hand-detacheable Westley Richards type drop locks.
And then the question popped up - was there any real practical advantage of these locks for the Edwardian sportsman?
My answer to this one was: "pure marketing".
First, I struggle to remember a mention of a gun failure in the books. Accidents did happen (I remember reading that Ripon once blew the barrels off gun #1 with gun #3), but, with best guns which were serviced between seasons, that would have been too rare to bother about.
Second, these old chaps shot two and three guns with loaders. One breaks down, you just go on shooting with the other two and deal with the problem later. Walsingham, when after those 1070 record grouse, had three guns to shoot with and one to spare - if any went wrong, would he want to bother with it while birds fly overhead, or simply take another?
Third, OK, your gun doesn't work, you pull out the lock and stare at it. Then what? Can you fix it there and then, right next to your peg? Without any gunsmithing experience? Without tools and workbench?
The third point is my personal biggest question about hand-detacheable locks. An average hunter can't do much in terms of fixing them anyway. Maybe replace a broken mainspring - but even for that you're going to need some tools. And if you have a kit of tools with you, there are screwdrivers in it anyway. Then what's the point of the locks being hand-detacheable?
But the guys there asked me to go out and ask you, dear ladies and gentlemen of the board - what do you think about hand-detacheable locks, WR droplocks in particular?
Do they offer a real advantage?
How common were the failures of shotguns in Victorian/Edwardian driven shoots?
Could a droplock from one WR be put into another WR and work? (Guess not)
How often were WR droplocks ordered with a set of spare locks?
Thank you in advance.