S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (eightbore),
283
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,518
Posts545,702
Members14,419
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,464 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,464 Likes: 212 |
You probably meant who in the heck is a-n-e, and are they responsible for their actions. Regardless of ideology, don't they have a responsibility to their bottom line, sponsors, owners, employees, etc. etc. Libs like to play the shake down game. Wouldn't have been smarter to have a decent pr firm craft up a 'sincere' apology on their website, and made a 'considerable' donation to the alphabet coalition.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
Except this is the USA...and you can't fire someone for proclaiming they are a butt pirate.
And its discriminatory to fire someone for proclaiming they are Christian.
Incidently Phil Robinson and his family are self made multi-millionares. Most if not all of them are college graduates....with minimums of 4 year degrees.
This was all before that reality show concept ever crossed anyones mind.
Phil Robinson probibly makes more money from is real job (not the tv show)than the network moron that fired him dreams of making.
Last edited by boneheaddoctor; 12/20/13 01:37 PM.
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time. We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015 |
Michlle Malkin has a good read about GLAAD (the thugs behind the A@E "shakedown"): "GLAAD has worked tirelessly to marginalize and suppress the free speech of Christian leaders, Christian businesses and conservative talk-radio hosts dating back to their infamous Dr. Laura boycott 13 years ago. The group's mission is not about equality or defending against "defamation." It's about silencing critics,"GLAAD: Lethal Enforcers of the Left's Tolerance Mobhttp://townhall.com/columnists/michellem...n1766200/page/1" For the civility police, the operational motto is always: "Do as we say, not as we do, in the name of social justice. Amen." " It's not enough to live and let live. You must repent and genuflect before the self-serving gods of selective progressivism." " Nail, meet head. GLAAD's counterculture warriors know full well: It's a small leap from forcing Phil Robertson, the Boy Scouts and Rush Limbaugh out of the public square to forcing wedding photographers and cake bakers to serve gay customers against their will and mandating that Catholic medical providers and Hobby Lobby violate their religious conscience and cover abortion pills in order to stay in business. These GLAAD tidings have everything to do with repression and nothing to do with rights.
Hillary For Prison 2018
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
I don't know how many of you watched Megyn Kelly (Fox) interview that twerp from GLAAD last night. I could tell it was all she could do to restrain herself from verbally teeing off on this deviant. These people are even more bizarre than I expected and this came across clearly. We MUST keep the pressure on to insure that the 1st Amendment right doesn't become "discretionary" and selective which is what these deviants are arguing. Jim
Last edited by italiansxs; 12/20/13 02:02 PM.
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,172 Likes: 1158
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,172 Likes: 1158 |
Who in heck is Phil Robinson and Duck Dynasty? One is free to say whatever they want but it should be obvious to anyone with tiny amount of common sense that there might be repercussions to what they have stated. If you really don't know who they are, your interests would be better served by doing a little research (there is a search engine named Google that can help) before you voice opinions. Phil knew full well the implications of making the statements he did. Do you have the impression he is crying about all this fallout? When you have the courage of your convictions it does not matter what the repercussions are, you say and do what needs to be said and done, because it is the RIGHT THING. Those who shrink from the task because of the potential consequences are cowards, and not even fit to speak on the subject. SRH
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015 |
Hillary For Prison 2018
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,850
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,850 |
Right on target Stan. Since I can't give you any more stars in your profile here's five more. *****
Practice safe eating. Always use a condiment.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 890
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 890 |
If Phil Robertson was "politically correct" he wouldn't have 14 million viewers...DUH And any first year college marketing student would know this. Six months from now we'll see how A&E likes shooting themselves in the profit foot. But, this is not the underlying problem....the problem is the moronic liberal brain farts; e.g. Phil gets suspended for stating his religious beliefs and convictions(because it pissed off some gays) The former president of Iran, Amajinadad(can't spell the idiot's name) routinely had homosexuals put to death and the liberals at Columbia University had him as a guest speaker. Thought for the day: If Phil had quoted the Koran in his assessment of homosexual behavior would A&E have suspended him?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,465 Likes: 207
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,465 Likes: 207 |
Why is it OK with A&E to commit the actions , but not OK for Phil to describe the actions "championed" by them. Mike
Last edited by Der Ami; 12/21/13 02:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,703 Likes: 103 |
I didn't sign onto the petitions favoring Phil's position. While I think it is foolishness to deny the Biblical admonition that homosexuality is a sin, I can't agree with Phil's statement that they're going to Hell for sure. Personally I don't feel qualified to express a public opinion on who's going to Hell and who ain't.
The Christ I pray to is one of redemption and I believe all who accept His Grace are welcome to whatever Kingdom there may be. Phil's Old Testament opinion is not my own.
The law differentiates crimes that are malum in se (sins) and malum in prohibitum (like leash laws for dog owners). Changing norms in our society dictated the reversal of sodomy laws and we opened the door to the gay revolution. Like it or not we have it now...Geo
P.S.: I know better than to mention my own personal values here but I just did anyway.
Last edited by Geo. Newbern; 12/21/13 05:21 PM. Reason: cain't spell
|
|
|
|
|