I was measuring a barrel for thickness.I was able to measure the inside at a marked location eight inches into the barrel of a 12 gauge and came up with .735 on the inside and used micromiter to measure the outside and came up with .850 ok so .850 - .735 = .115 I divide it by 2 and come up with .0575
Is that right.I hear you say .020 is too thin. Am I doing something wrong.
Is this ok?
Respectfully, no it is not. You are making the assumption that the bore is concentric. This does not have to be the case. Obtain the proper tools for the job. Measure the wall thickness at the same distance from the breech, working around the barrel and you can often see the wall vary.
I will add my 2 cents to this.
A $100 wallthickness gauge will do the job and is available at Brownells. You should modify it with a little spring clip to aid the reliability of the measurements as many here have done.
This is excellent advice. The proper tool for the job. I will add that once you purchase the tool, discard the dial caliper and purchase a digital caliper as a replacement. It makes life much simpler. Thanks to james-l for that one! You can find one for $30-$40.
Barrels are manufactured by boring a larger diameter bar with a "gun drill" which is a single sided cutting tip to make it cut a long straight hole (believe it or not). The bore is then reamed and and honed to finish diameter.
I have to disagree with you here Chuck. You are assuming a single manufacturing process was used in all places at all times. We both know this is not the case.
Longitudinally welded barrels were very commonly used. At first this was a hand process. Later a mechanized process was used.
It is also not the case for damascus barrels. They were all created using a mandrel. At least in western Europe. The chemise was predominately Belgian, but not singular to them.
Pete