doublegunshop.com - home Forums General Discussion DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com Parker "G" Damascus barrels

Here's the link:
http://www.cabelas.com/catalog/largeImag..._parkerg10ga_01

From the engraving it looks like it's been misidentified as a "G", and is the "P" grade.

There is an ad for "The Parker Story" in the Spring 2001 DGJ, with a picture of a twist barreled hammerless, it looks like the same model, and the twist patterns match.

If the one in the picture is the one we are discussing, its a grade 1 or "P" grade; the twist barrels are the most common. The treasure there is to find one of the few made with steel barrels...Geo

I seldom look at Parkers as they carry such a premium, for a reason I suppose, but unlike other vintage US doubles I have experienced one and liked it.

Lacking the assurance of a nitro proof, is it conceivable that a twist barrels of this weight (assuming no corrosion or modification issues) could be counted upon to handle moderate pressure loads? At 3", only lower pressure factory (RST) shells are available anyway, with the only alternative being handloading using 2 7/8 data (which I've done).

I've noticed English damasacus guns advertised in nitro proof in spite of having 1/3 of original wall thickness honed out, i.e, a gun with original proof at 13b now sporting .740 bores. If twist barrels this thin can pass proof, either they are much stronger than generally believed or proof testing is suspect.

In case a Parker expert is online, the serial number of the gun in question is 86151. Also confirmed is the "P" stamp on the watertable.

Thanks.

R.C., I would not be too quick to call that a restock. Granted, it has an unusually high comb but after looking at the pictures under magnification, I see nothing that says "restock" to me. Except for the frame appearing to have been polished, it looks like a nice "righteous" 1897 Parker PH to me.

The stock shape and dimensions would be a bit unusual,wouldn't you say?

As to the misidentification of grade in the ad, how can you miss that, there is a "P" on the watertable.

Cabela's makes their share of mistakes in describing guns, so the fact that it is a Grade 1 and they list it as a Grade 2 is no big surprise.... they probably didn't mean to deceive anyone.

The stock shape and dimensions may be a tad unusual but for cold weather ducks and geese while wearing heavy clothing I think those dimensions and the high comb are just about right.

I have ordered PGCA research letters on guns I was interested in and if there are records on that gun perhaps a research latter will answer questions about the stock.

Well, it's not a Grade 2 darn it, but as described it appears to be in decent condition, which for me is a greater consideration.

James Flynn in Alexandria, LA is only a hour's drive away and has agreed to check it out for me, says he's looked at quite a number of them for his customers. If they will give me enough inspection time for him to get to it.

Any comments on taking the plunge with a composite barreled gun?

If the bores are decent and the wall thickness is sufficient I would not be afraid to buy that Parker.

An NID 10 (2 7/8) has been on my list for a long time, though never having handled one (I've yet to handle a Parker 10, for that matter; you never see them in LA). The Ithaca version, from photos look a bit clumsy, especially with the BTFE. I'll guess the Parker would come closer to the handling characteristics I've tried in vain to find on a big, heavy gun.

Oh, well I've never lost money on a 10 gauge, so may as well have a look at it.

Thanks to all.