|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,541
Posts546,044
Members14,420
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,832 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,832 Likes: 13 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
Those fellows not only built great guns with their name stamped on it but built so many wonderful guns for so many other firms that I often look at a lesser known English masterpiece and cannot help but think, I wonder who built that gun for them, probably W & C Scott.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,704 Likes: 103
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,704 Likes: 103 |
Hey, I have that same gun complete with long necked goose or swan or whatever that thing is on the left lock plate. Same long shanked forend release lever and same engraving. Mine is 1887 (coupla years newer), but yours is in much nicer condition. Do you happen to know what that model was called?...Geo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
OWDs: Can you share with us how you acquired this example? I have a suspicion there may be an interesting story here. Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,530 Likes: 82
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,530 Likes: 82 |
In there best days Scott guns cost more than Purdey's.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 496
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 496 |
gunman: I'm not sure of that. But I do know that no small number of Purdeys originated at Scott's.
Best, Kensal
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,275 Likes: 528
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,275 Likes: 528 |
gunman: I'm not sure of that. But I do know that no small number of Purdeys originated at Scott's.
Best, Kensal Its true. This gun in its day cost more than a Purdey. http://www.gunsinternational.com/W-C-Sco...43CCB56D227E4BA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,832 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,832 Likes: 13 |
Eye-taliansxs-
Old lady had it. Told her it was too dangerous to have around and she gave me $200 to dispose of it in a professional manner.
Ha. Kidding.
Plain old gun deal. When I called about it, the seller said "By the way, it came in an old box. You want it?"
OWD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 496
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 496 |
LeFusil: If you meant to say that SOME Scott guns cost more than SOME Purdeys, especially in light of your example, then I would tend to agree.
Best, Kensal
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,275 Likes: 528
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,275 Likes: 528 |
Here's what I meant to say Kensal....the VERY top of the line Scott (Premier) did cost more than the top of the line Purdey during that time period. The gun I linked a picture to would have been in the stratosphere in regards to cost, doubt anything came close to it price wise in the 1880's.
Dustin
|
|
|
|
|
|