S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,475
Posts545,172
Members14,409
|
Most Online1,335 Apr 27th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 209
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 209 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 638
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 638 |
pwm,
It looks like a L.C. Smith No. 3 (grade) American side lock. Yes, it has value especially to the collectors found at LCSmith.org
Elsie's are great guns! Enjoy shooting it!
USMC Retired
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417 Likes: 314
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,417 Likes: 314 |
Very nice. You have a L.C. Smith Quality No. 3 made by Hunter Arms Co., Fulton New York in 1895. I believe there is a faint damascus pattern visible underneath the blueing. Nitro-3 Fluid Steel was first available on No. 3 guns in 1895 however. The top lever has been blued, and was originally case colored, as were the receiver and lockplates. Beavertail forends were not offered until 1920, so the gun may have been restocked at some point (and I believe it was based on the wood to metal fit of the lockplate.) If you'll look underneath the trigger guard, an original stock would have the serial number stamped into the wood. You can learn alot more on the L.C. Smith Collectors Association site http://www.lcsmith.org/Check 'Shotguns', 'FAQ', and 'Photo Trail' on the Home Page. Please review the 'Disassembly and Reassembly' FAQ and be sure that the hammers are cocked before reattaching the forend. BTW: unless special ordered, Smith 12g chambers were 2 3/4" from the beginning of production Any idea how this treasure made it to Germany?
Last edited by revdocdrew; 03/07/09 09:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961 Likes: 9
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,961 Likes: 9 |
It is a pre 1913 #3 gun and appears to have a Lairds patent single trigger. A great trigger until it goes out of adjustment then a real bear. Use light loads because Smiths were known to split stocks. bill
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 209
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 209 |
thank you, I will move to the forum
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,125 Likes: 198
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,125 Likes: 198 |
In its refinished and restocked condition, it is not of interest to collectors in the U.S., and probably of less interest in Germany.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,158 Likes: 114
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,158 Likes: 114 |
Great fotos Sir, thanks for sharing. Nice to see gun safety practiced where you live, in the fourth foto frame, the pistol (a 1911 or a clone perhaps) shown next to the writing materials has the slide back in 'open battery', good gun manners indeed. An open gun is a safer gun, however, there is no such thing in my book as a safe gun, that is a responsibility of the owner or those who handle same.
Your Smith, I believe, is a non-ejector Grade 3 12 bore-looks like from the two milled recesses in the water table flats it takes the protruding pins from the early style extractor design- complicated machining, but a smooth functioning design. I prefer pre-1913 Smiths with double triggers, ejectors or extractors, no strong preference there, as I reload AA 12 gauge loads- I have a 12 Grade 2E serial no. 1074 and with the same patent dates on the left side water table flat as your gun, just the serial number on the right flat, an ejector gun so no milled pin recesses. I guess it originally had Damascus barrels, was sent back to Fulton in the late 1920's apparently and a new set of Nitro steel 32" barrels was fitted to same.
Can you detail the barrel markings as I have done on my older Grade 2E and list them here please? So much to learn about older quality doubles, thank you in advance for sharing with us. RWTF
Last edited by Run With The Fox; 03/10/09 07:07 PM.
"The field is the touchstone of the man"..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 209
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 209 |
thank you all, RWTF you have very good eyes, its a norinco clone
this gun is part of deal and I dont know if keep it or leave it. nobody here know anything about it but when I read l.c.smith on the lookplate's something ringing in my ears like doomsday. of course it have no value on the german market. problem is that the single trigger have some problems which seems to be very common for this design. I hear different oppinions, some say its restocked and refinish. another voice says the beavertail forend was available in 1920. I understand now that this means it is a orignal forend!this story make sense when another member here say the steel barrel was maybe fitted to the gun in the 1920's. is it possible that the gun was reworked in fulton in the 20.century? when it was shoot as a pigeon gun it make sense that after 25-30 years a complete rework in Fulton was on the list. question is for me if it make sense to keep this gun and restore it. money put into this project makes only sense if the gun is to sell on the american market later again. whats is with the original colour case on the action, polished in fulton or bubba work. good idea to make the colour case hardening again? I have the gun again in my hand in 2 weeks.
Last edited by pwm; 03/09/09 10:23 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,728 Likes: 50
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,728 Likes: 50 |
pmw, Are the barrels serial numbered to the gun? There were two type of barrels offered then, Good Damascus and Nitro Steel for your grade gun in that year. If the stock is original, there should be a serial number under the trigger guard in the inletted wood, as stated before. It looks like a Pachmyer recoil pad and I believe that no recoil pads were offered in 1895, and the White Line Pachmyer is from the late 1940's I believe. The forend is not correct. It would be a splinter typw with a piece of ebony at the tip and with a black plastic round disc of a dogs head imbedded into the forend. The Hunter One-Trigger can be a nightmare, try backing out the one screw holding the side locks on by a half turn. If that doesn't work and you still have a problem, take the trigger guard wood screws taken out, lift the trigger guard out of the inletted wood and rotate the trigger guard counter-clockwise to reveal another screw going up to the top tang right behind the safety. Loosen this screw by half-a-turn also and try again.
By the way the Hunter One Trigger was not available until 1904 in catalogs but was put on a few guns in 1901. The stock would have to be modified to accept the Hunter One Trigger, making it more prone to cracking with the wrong loads.
Unless guns of this age were keep in a closet out of the sun light and not handled, very few have the case-colors left. They turn that nice satin patina like yours. To have it re-cased colored means that the side plates would have to be re-annealed to make them soft again and then case hardened again. Case colors are the by-product of the case hardening process, and in this country only a few can get the L.C. Smith colors. I would leave it alone.
Good luck with it.
David
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,158 Likes: 114
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 8,158 Likes: 114 |
You are most welcome, and thanks for your kind remark on my visual acuity- still 20/20 uncorrected and as I am right handed, also a right dominant eye. Great news for a die-hard shooter like myself. I have no idea how you would sell that fine but not 100% original Smith in Germany, but if you come back to the States and wish to sell it, please advise me. What is the barrel length and barrel steel grade markings? I prefer double triggered pre-1913 Smiths and only 12 gauge. Why? I shoot 12's better than any other gauge, and only reload for 12. Also, Smith always chambered their 12 gauge guns in the std. 2.75",(except the 3" Long Range version that came out in the mid 1920's I believe) whereas some Fox, Parker and other US mfg. 12 gauge guns had shorter chambers back in that era. 16's are OK, but the early Smiths in 16 gauge had 2.5" chambers for quite some time, ditto the 20 gauge.
Also, simple economics- there were way more 12 gauge Smiths made, especially the better finished pre-1913 series, than the 16 and 20 gauges, hence greater possible supply to meet the ever growing demand. I believe I saw a 12 2E or 3E that had been restocked, also with Hunter One Trigger, in recent Action Arms Auction Site. Also, perhaps others advised you of this, but if you let the hammers down on a Smith when you store it, ALWAYS make sure you re-open the gun to recock the hammers before you dis-assemble it for cleaning, etc. RWTF
Last edited by Run With The Fox; 03/11/09 01:47 PM.
"The field is the touchstone of the man"..
|
|
|
|
|