|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
1 members (Tim in PA),
334
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,523
Posts545,810
Members14,420
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Lowell: Have you been into the scotch laced with gunpowder again? Quote: "Here is good link to his actual record http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Barack_Obama_Gun_Control.htm Yes, I do not find it comforting. Surprised?" Let see If I can get the straight. You don't find it(Obamas record) conforting? So now you're attacking me for pointing this out and indicating we'rve got some rough times ahead as firearms owners? I'm the one with the highly biased and absurd words? Quote: "And no, I don't happen to fit into either category, or any other that you might recognize." On this I can agree. An individual who doesn't find Obamas record conforting but attacks another for pointing out specifically why this guy is the equivelent to the bubonic plague for gun owners is certainly in an unrecognizable category. . Apparentely you are some type on neo left wing liberal mutant who professes to see a problem yet can see no point in trying to point this problem out to others. I rarely attack someone personally but in this case you are beneath contempt. Please crawl back into you dreamworld and leave dealing with reality to those of us capable of understanding it. Just what DON'T you understand about reestablishing the "Assault Weapons Ban" and making it permanant as he's already stated he'll do? Lets see if you can answer one point directly or you'll wander off on a tangent like the rest of your socialist brethern. Jim
Last edited by italiansxs; 11/09/08 11:32 PM.
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 256
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 256 |
If Ronald Reagan were alive today what do you think he would say about the last 8 years Al Well, Bouvier, the first thing he would say would be: "Nice job handling 911; that was a dastardly attack. The second thing he would say: smart decision, deciding to fight the war on terror in the middle-east, where the terrorists live; rather than fighting it in downtown Manhattan, where we lose badly. Third, he would acknowledge that most people can't even spell deficit, let alone explain it. But he would suggest even deeper tax cuts to the rich, to reduce it. And lastly: he would place the blame for the economic crisis squarely where it belongs, on the backs of the Liberals....... And he would also praise President Bush for his BOOMING economy.....Without which, the Libs would have led us into a deeeeep depression..........Grant.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 937
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 937 |
Apparentely you are some type on neo left wing liberal mutant who professes to see a problem yet can see no point in trying to point this problem out to others. I rarely attack someone personally but in this case you are beneath contempt. Please crawl back into you dreamworld and leave dealing with reality to those of us capable of understanding it.
Sure wish I could rely folks like on you when push comes to shove. But THAT would be living in a DREAMWORLD. Do you really think that USA gun owners and shooters are so dumb that they need you to point out the obvious? And with such devisive language as to alienate a bunch of us in the process? You must me one of those anti-gunners under deep cover, out to forment trouble for gun owners. If not, it would sure be nice if you found some means of turning your nasty language and foul attitude into constructive actions on behalf of your fellow gun owners and shooters. Niklas
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015 |
I guess the question is this,are we group that only collects double guns and niave and selfish enough to thinks its ok if they reinstate the AWB,ban handgun sales,increase the tax on ammo (%500),and perhaps let a "arsenal" licence become the law of the land?? I hope not many of us collect and enjoy shooting all types of guns and enjoy the freedom of the second anmendment.But most importantly are not ready to throw our fellow gun owners under the bus. B Hussian Obama ,a former director of the Joyce foundation hase never stood up for the second amendment in his votes and evert time has voted against us (all of us). http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6860231852229872583
Hillary For Prison 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 986
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 986 |
YEA!!!! Let's bring back Herbert Hoover ...... Oh, wait ..... we already had 8 years of that ..... If Ronald Reagan were alive today what do you think he would say about the last 8 years ...... the outrageous deficit ...... the debt to China ........ our destroyed banking system ...... Do you think he would say ....... " Nice job W! " .......
Al Let's not bring back FDR either. It was FDR who went on a spending spree and ran up a government deficit to try to boost the economy. His policies helped to keep this nation in the Depression. What got this nation out of the Depression was WWII, not FDR or his policies. Also, FDR wanted America to get involved in the war, but Congress said no until Dec. 7, 1941 happened.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 433
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 433 |
That's pretty artful casuistry, Nitro. If "McCain watched Reagan's tax policies work, and believed in them," as you say, why didn't he use them as Obama and Reagan did---and won?
It can't be excused as poor skills on McCain's part; he had all the communications tools at hand and two years to use them. It was Obama who used Reagan's pitch of fighting for average Americans, not McCain.
I posted here last week that "Obama is in" because "the conservatives gave it away." There wasn't a world of doubt on election night. One early glimpse of the gathering crowds at Grant Park, with enough flags for a coronation, proved it.
With all the polls blinking blue, the only question was whether it would be a landslide. Let's be honest with ourselves: with rampant greed ruining millions of Americans, a promise of more equitable distribution of wealth was appealing. Disappointing, King. Your response doesn't even rise to the level of sophistry, but I'm not surprised. You can't debate the point on the issue because you have no knowledge of it, so you continue to post didactic, false statements. Pathetic. My original evaluation of your post was correct.
"Serious rifles have two barrels, everything else just burns gunpowder."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 937
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 937 |
[/quote] What got this nation out of the Depression was WWII, not FDR or his policies. Also, FDR wanted America to get involved in the war, but Congress said no until Dec. 7, 1941 happened. [/quote]
Easy to agree that WW2 got USA out of depression. However, for most of remaining nations, folks lives were destroyed or further destroyed (many killed, others lost everything) by WW2 and the diverse messes leading up to and following it. For them WW2, etc. was just a continuation of the nightmare, a nightmare that lasted lots longer in most of world than in USA.
The common discription I read on 05 November in foreign newspapers of Obama's new job is "nightmare". Lets hope that is an exaggeration. Like the Great Depression and WW2, the current financial crisis is consequence of well-intended, often in narrow self interest, actions of large number of people, across political spectrum in many countries.
Niklas
|
|
|
|
|
