April
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 192 guests, and 5 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,441
Posts544,760
Members14,404
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 568
slate Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 568
My knowledge of Sauer shotguns is pitifully poor. What book(s) would you suggest you acquire? I have been offered a gun that the seller refers to as a 60e. It is a boxlock with scalloped receiver and ejectors. He isn't asking much for it. I looked it over and asked him how he knew it was designated a 60e to which he replied that is the description given to him when he purchased it 20 years ago. Not much info to hang one's hat on. Then he told me it was slightly lower in quality than the Royal. Well all the Royals I have seen have lacked the scalloped back and were in my opinion lower in quality than the subject gun. Help appreciated. Thanks Slate

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Slate, did you read member Stephens' DGJ articles? If not, I'll have a look for any relevant information. Regards, King

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 568
slate Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 568
King, I did read one of the articles from the DGJ but did not receive the next edition to read the other. Found it most interesting but couldn't identify the gun in hand by comparing to my memory of the detail in the article. I will read again this PM. Maybe I am missing something.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770
Likes: 182
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770
Likes: 182
slate:

I would suggest to visit the German Gun Collectors Association's site or Gunnerman and purchase some of the Sauer reprint catalogues. Also, "The Shooter's Bible" from the 1950's and 1960's will list Sauers. Last, Sauer may be found in "Arms of the World-1911."

Kind Regards,

Raimey
rse

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,350
Jeff Stephens wrote three very informative articles on Sauer for DGJ. They were mostly about the earlier models and grades. In the Spring 2004 edition:

"The Sauer Grade 60s outnumber the Grade 45s by a wide margin. The reason for this is not known but perhaps a potential buyer for a Grade 45 in the first few years of the last century would have decided to spend the additional $200 in order to buy the most highly embellished Grade 60 to really distinguish the particular Sauer gun from all others produced. Any potential buyer of a Grade 45 would have to ante up some $400 to pay for one of the finest examples ever produced and a staggering sum, for the times, of $600 for the Grade 60. In today's dollars, that $400 an individual paid for a Grade 45 in 1907 is roughly equivalent to $8,000 and the Grade 60 priced at $600 in 1907, is roughly equivalent to $12,000. . .Four to six hundred dollars was not small change by any means in 1907 and this explains why so few of these higher-graded boxlocks were produced."

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,307
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,307
I think your friend's memory of the model designation may be flawed. The Royal was a nice gun, but the Model 60 was in a league by itself, a fine example of Sauer's work. If it is a highly engraved Sauer, you might want to jump on it at a fairly low price, then figure out which model you have. For what it's worth, all the Royals I have seen were scalloped back actions, not straight back. That's not to say there could not have been straight back Royals, I just don't know. Jeff is the real expert, maybe he'll be along.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,375
Likes: 105
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,375
Likes: 105
There's some confusion here. I think the gun you're talking about may be one of the post-war West German-made guns. If so, it should say either "Made in West Germany" and/or "Eckernforde" on the barrels. If he's comparing it in quality to a Royal (also a post-war gun), that would make sense. In the post-war guns, the Model 60 was the basic gun, DT and extractors. 60E was the same gun with ejectors. The photo I have does not show a scalloped receiver (which does show on the photo I have of a Royal--both from an old Shooter's Bible), but I'm guessing this is the gun you're talking about. If so, they're pretty solid guns. Quite a few 60's I've seen seem to have minor problems with the wood right behind the receiver. Usually just surface cracks, wood lifting away from the metal. Pretty easy fix for a decent stock guy.

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,111
Likes: 195
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,111
Likes: 195
After reading all of Jeff Stephens' articles, the next step is to determine the age of the gun by serial number and date markings. Then you are less likely to go off on a tangent, identifying your gun as a variation not in production at the time your particular gun was made. In other words, if you have a 1907 gun, you won't waste time looking for it in a 1958 Stoeger catalog.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 568
slate Offline OP
Sidelock
**
OP Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 568
Thanks a lot guys! I got my hands on the DGJ from Summer 2004. I sure wish the gun was like the model 60 described in the article but it is not. Rather it is a post war gun with only minimal engraving conforming to Larry's explanation. It does have decent wood and is in good condiion mechanically but only minimal engraving. After looking at the photos of the grade 40 and 45 guns in Jeff Stephen's article one could be enticed to go on the hunt for a Sauer of such quality. Thanks Again - lots to learn. Slate

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 638
Likes: 2
All the post war German guns had a quality mark on the right side of the rear lump.(or was it the left?)
Either a "2" or a "1" in a diamond or a fancy "Q".
This mark does not seem to be directly related to the guns grade , but rather the overall fitting polishing etc.
That said my BUHAG has a "1" but is better finished than most "Q" marked guns I have seen.
Judge the gun on its individual merits.

GDU


Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.079s Queries: 35 (0.058s) Memory: 0.8357 MB (Peak: 1.8988 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-18 07:10:22 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS