|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 members (Krag 1902, Fudd, LeFusil, 1 invisible),
401
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,479
Posts545,207
Members14,410
| |
Most Online1,335
Apr 27th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 306 Likes: 70
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 306 Likes: 70 |
Please lock this post down. I don’t know why you’ve let it degenerate so
|
|
1 member likes this:
mark |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,563 Likes: 70
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,563 Likes: 70 |
Any time a topic goes more than 2 pages it’s a same old same old!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,715 Likes: 415
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,715 Likes: 415 |
Any time a topic goes more than 2 pages it’s a same old same old! Yup.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/qclHjMQ.jpg)
|
|
1 member likes this:
Jimmy W |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212 |
Any time a topic goes more than 2 pages it’s a same old same old! Yup. Two camps Mark, one side is pro 2nd., the other are faux friends, neither are trolls. We are in a time of not having the luxury of feel good, common ground.
|
|
1 member likes this:
Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,153 Likes: 1150
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,153 Likes: 1150 |
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
1 member likes this:
Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 306 Likes: 70
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 306 Likes: 70 |
Any time a topic goes more than 2 pages it’s a same old same old! Yup. Two camps Mark, one side is pro 2nd., the other are faux friends, neither are trolls. We are in a time of not having the luxury of feel good, common ground. Exactly true. I guess it’s because there are a couple of true believers and the rest of us need to go to reeducation camps
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,377 Likes: 105
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,377 Likes: 105 |
There's always common ground. I doubt we have any anti-hunters here. That's a good point from which to start. Some may have decided that they're not going to shoot lead at all anymore. Others--and I'm one of the others--don't see any problem using lead other than where the law says we have to use nontox. I think we should always question the REQUIREMENT to use nontox when there isn't solid biological evidence. But I'm not going to harass people who CHOOSE to use nontox as long as they don't step over the line and support a total ban on lead.
|
|
3 members like this:
graybeardtmm3, Jimmy W, SKB |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,993 Likes: 402
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,993 Likes: 402 |
Common ground.....something you would think would be easier to find on a bbs like this, not so much these days.
|
|
1 member likes this:
Jimmy W |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,715 Likes: 415
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,715 Likes: 415 |
There's always common ground. I doubt we have any anti-hunters here. That's a good point from which to start. Some may have decided that they're not going to shoot lead at all anymore. Others--and I'm one of the others--don't see any problem using lead other than where the law says we have to use nontox. I think we should always question the REQUIREMENT to use nontox when there isn't solid biological evidence. But I'm not going to harass people who CHOOSE to use nontox as long as they don't step over the line and support a total ban on lead. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. That has always been my policy.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan)
|
|
1 member likes this:
Jimmy W |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212 |
There's always common ground. I doubt we have any anti-hunters here. That's a good point from which to start. Some may have decided that they're not going to shoot lead at all anymore. Others--and I'm one of the others--don't see any problem using lead other than where the law says we have to use nontox. I think we should always question the REQUIREMENT to use nontox when there isn't solid biological evidence. But I'm not going to harass people who CHOOSE to use nontox as long as they don't step over the line and support a total ban on lead. Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. That has always been my policy. I know, Larry, that your comment is reasonable, and likely none of us have gotten through life without being reasonable, or having some degree of decorum. None of what you, me or prof says matters, as our "discussions" are not binding policy. There's no doubt in my mind, that there are various tiers of science. How many of us would let a heart or brain surgeon, operate on a loved one, if they said, I can remove a complicated tumor, because this graph says, in ten or fifteen years, I predict I'll get it right. I support true science, always, but definitely not profs, whose content of character reveals their political bias. My life does not revolve around the 2nd, but includes every, not some, policy that's imposed or selectively enforced.
|
|
|
|
|
