March
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Who's Online Now
4 members (NZHunter, Dale May, SKB, 1 invisible), 294 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics38,373
Posts543,977
Members14,389
Most Online1,131
Jan 21st, 2024
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Jwilkins3 #596217 04/27/21 09:39 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 324
Likes: 9
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 324
Likes: 9
No Ed. they are just commin for a little each time so you don't notice. Today it's this bad gun, tomorrow it's that bad gun. Soon you will hear that that rifle is to accurate. Why would anyone but a nut need a rifle that accurate? Mark my words! One bill is already proposing a 2000FPS velocity limit!

ed good #596230 04/28/21 07:49 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 378
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 378
Originally Posted by ed good
day may not care today, but cordin to keith, de comin fur awl our gons...soon...

This comment is sheer foolishness ed. I never said such a thing.

As tanky notes, the anti-gun Democrats keep attempting to take our 2nd Amendment Rights a little at a time. The big push right now is to take semi-automatic rifles and to implement Universal Background Checks. One of the bills Democrats just passed would make it a felony for you to loan your cousin a gun for hunting or target shooting without paying for a transfer and background check. Of course, another check would be required for them to return the gun to you. It would be illegal to loan or give a friend or relative a gun for personal defense unless they were in immediate danger. A mere violent threat against them would not be enough, and would violate their law. Large capacity magazines are also a recent target.

If they are successful, they will come after handguns once again, as they have in the past. And they have also attempted legislation to ban rifles and ammunition that is capable of penetrating Police body armor. Of course, such a ban would target rocky mtn bill's bolt action elk rifles.

The U.S. Supreme Court just agreed to hear an appeal concerning Concealed Carry laws. The outcome will be very interesting, but there is little doubt what the outcome would be with a couple more Liberal anti-gunners appointed by anti-gun Democrats.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us...ase-carrying-handguns-public-2021-04-26/

Anti-gun Democrats are playing the long game. They started with the NFA of 1934. The next big push was the Gun Control Act of 1968. Now it is a more or less constant stream of one anti-gun measure after another, always picking away at our gun rights. They know that they must engage in incrementalism at this point. But enough of them have stated their objective to eliminate the 2nd Amendment that only complete fools would think that sporting shotguns would be exempt from future restrictions and bans.

Virtually all of these anti-gun measures come from Democrats. Virtually all of them target law abiding citizens. Amazingly, some gun owners keep supporting the anti-gun Democrats who are attacking our Constitutional Right. That is even dumber than you misrepresenting what I say about it.


A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.

Jwilkins3 #596243 04/28/21 10:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
so, are the supremes gonna protect our rights? re the ny law that restricts the right of the people of ny state to bear arms?

or are they gonna rule that states have the power to infringe on peoples rights, as the 2nd amendment only forbids federal infringement and does not apply to state infringements?

and another thing...right now, if i drive from nh to va, with a handgun, i am violating the laws of five states: ma, ct, ny, nj and md...seems like those states should honor the laws of my home state, nh...but they dont...

Last edited by ed good; 04/28/21 11:23 AM.

keep it simple and keep it safe...
ed good #596260 04/28/21 02:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 378
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 378
Originally Posted by ed good
so, are the supremes gonna protect our rights? re the ny law that restricts the right of the people of ny state to bear arms?

or are they gonna rule that states have the power to infringe on peoples rights, as the 2nd amendment only forbids federal infringement and does not apply to state infringements?

and another thing...right now, if i drive from nh to va, with a handgun, i am violating the laws of five states: ma, ct, ny, nj and md...seems like those states should honor the laws of my home state, nh...but they dont...

Ed, nobody knows how the Court will rule on this case. But this case is being heard to decide if we have the Constitutional right to defend ourselves with firearms outside our homes. If you read the 2nd Amendment, and you read the words of the Framers, nowhere does it say you can only defend yourself in your home.

What we do know from past history is that the Justices who were seated on the Supreme Court by Liberal Democrats all provided sworn statements during their confirmation hearings saying that they respect the 2nd Amendment Rights of U.S. citizens. But when push comes to shove, most all of the Liberal Justices side with the anti-gunners, and go against law abiding citizens and gun owners. This is where we will see Trump's legacy in the votes of the three Justices he nominated, along with three others nominated by Republican Presidents. I would bet that the three Liberals will rule against gun owners. It's what they do.

You mentioned how you would currently be violating the laws of five states if you drove from NH to Va. with a handgun. I have no doubt that is probably true. I believe you because every one of those states you mentioned is a Democrat Blue State. This Supreme Court case concerns restrictions in New York, a Democrat Blue State. The 2008 Heller decision and the 2010 McDonald decision concerned anti-gun restrictions in Washington D.C. and Illinois, two more Democrat strongholds. That should tell you something. Virtually everywhere the 2nd Amendment Rights have been infringed is controlled by Democrats, and it was Democrats who passed those anti-gun laws. And it is Democrats who are always pressing to do more to gradually take away our Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

Is it any wonder that the same Liberal Democrats who are attempting to erode the 2nd Amendment are also trying to shut down free speech too? The Rights of a free people are just not consistent with creeping Socialism. Does it make sense that Liberal Democrats are always chipping away at the Gun Rights of law biding citizens, yet they wish to restore voting rights to convicted felons, and turn a blind eye to millions of illegal aliens ?

Finally, do you still believe the following statements you made here, or were you just trolling to ignite shit-storms?

Originally Posted by ed good
if society, via our law makers, deem it necessary to restrict or prohibit our possession of certain classes of arms, then every good citizen should obey the law for the good of the majority.

and if some here wish to discuss further restriction and prohibition of certain classes of arms here, then why not?

Originally Posted by ed good
as for the gun control issue...we are the only country in the world that seems to tolerate mass murder, in the name of an individual right...its about time that we as a society realize that we are over gunned with too many super dangerous weapons in the hands of too many super dangerous people... it is long past time to do as the rest of the civilized world has done and simply, disarm...


A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.

Jwilkins3 #596304 04/29/21 11:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
yep, still believe we should obey the law... and yep, part of the problem, is that too many semi auto firearms are in the hands of too many semi auto people...like vinnie here...


Last edited by ed good; 04/29/21 11:14 AM.

keep it simple and keep it safe...
Jwilkins3 #596331 04/29/21 11:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
mc Offline
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 384
That explains a lot about edds firearm education

Jwilkins3 #596337 04/30/21 09:51 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
?


keep it simple and keep it safe...
Jwilkins3 #596360 05/01/21 12:56 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 324
Likes: 9
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 324
Likes: 9
So actually you can travel with your handgun according to the Firearms owners protection act. If you are legal in the state you started from and will be legal in your destination state you are legal to travel. Your gun must be unloaded, locked in a case and inaccessible by you, like the trunk of a car. Of course if you are pulled over in one of the Democrat controlled commie states like my home state of NJ, expect to get arrested then the court will sort it out. You will win the case but you will lose 10's of thousands fighting it. Your trip will be ruined and so will you but hey, all in the name of getting all those guns off the streets. By the way I like guns, I'm always looking on the street when I'm out trying to find some of those guns but so far no luck! As far as the Supreme court goes, some of those justices are compromised and they must vote how their handlers tell them constitution be dammed. Did they look at any evidence of election rigging and take a case? No. When well north of 50% of Republicans think there was voter fraud and 25% of Democrats you would think they would look at it to calm things down. Democrat polices under Biden are designed to destroy the USA. When Putin of all people says the west is committing suicide you have to wonder what in the hell are these people thinking. I don't see the center of the country buying into gun control, critical race theory and insane LGBT whatever. We are at 1859 today just before the civil war.

Jwilkins3 #596367 05/01/21 09:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
Sidelock
*
Offline
Sidelock
*

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,718
Likes: 94
more like 1773...when americans north an south united to oppose tyranny...

let us all demonstrate that opposition at the ballot box, next year and in 2024...

Last edited by ed good; 05/01/21 09:15 AM.

keep it simple and keep it safe...
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.057s Queries: 33 (0.034s) Memory: 0.8497 MB (Peak: 1.8988 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-03-28 09:49:33 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS