doublegunshop.com - home
Posted By: skeettx Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 05:39 PM
Something to chew on
Mike

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIgvoJKovIg&t=194s
Posted By: Karl Graebner Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 06:39 PM
Mike,
It begs the question of why we can't find it on the shelfs of the stores.
Karl
Posted By: HomelessjOe Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 06:42 PM
The silent majority in this country is cOcked and locked.
Posted By: rocky mtn bill Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 06:47 PM
jOe, It's a great comfort to know you and the conservaturd TRumpists are ready to kill your fellow citizens because they had the nerve to out-vote you. It's a whole new definition if patriotism.Tell me, are the evangelicals joining in, or is this a step too far for them?
Posted By: HomelessjOe Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 06:49 PM
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill the Socialist tUrd
jOe, It's a great comfort to know you and the conservaturd TRumpists are ready to kill your fellow citizens because they had the nerve to out-vote you. It's a whole new definition if patriotism.Tell me, are the evangelicals joining in, or is this a step too far for them?


You're reading to much into what I said Billy bOy...
Posted By: Stanton Hillis Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 07:16 PM
I watched the video, then played it again to be sure I heard something right. He said there are 7 million new shooters since March ......

Reckon that is accurate? If so, it's mighty good news at a time when the only thing standing in the way of losing our second amendment right is the sheer number of shooters in America, and the strength of the NRA.

Now, to get those 7 million signed up as members, in the NRA.

SRH
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 07:31 PM
They sure do need your money Stan. Pony up!

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/21/839999178...zation-100-mill
Posted By: PALUNC Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 07:41 PM
7 million? That's more than actually voted for Joe
Posted By: Stanton Hillis Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 07:42 PM
Originally Posted By: nca225
They sure do need your money Stan. Pony up!


They? Are you anti-NRA, too?

Posted By: craigd Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 07:47 PM
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
....It's a great comfort to know you and the conservaturd TRumpists are ready to kill your fellow citizens because they had the nerve to out-vote you. It's a whole new definition if patriotism.Tell me, are the evangelicals joining in, or is this a step too far for them?

Awe bill, you just have a touch of makeupshititis, nothing a couple midols won't fix? I know what will bring you comfort and safety, add four or five more choices to the gender section on forms, eh? happy holidays, and I excuse from feeling bad about all the presents you will lavish on your grandkids, when others not only go without, but live in pain and misery, because of their identity.
Posted By: rocky mtn bill Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 08:17 PM
jOe, Craig, Maybe between you the two of you, you could clarify exactly what the point of jOe's post is. If nothing else. explain why you still feel the election was fishy. Dozens of Trump appointees and Republiucan officials have made it clear the election was sound. I know that's an outcome you're unhappy about. Now you know how we Dems felt 4 years ago. We didn't refuse, however, to acknowledge that it actually happened. To continue to question the outcome has a name: brain-washed stupidity.
Posted By: Chantry Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 08:24 PM
I haven't watched the video although I have heard about it. It's not very complicated and there is no need for conspiracy theories:
1. Covid came along and disrupted production of ammo and the related raw materials both domestically and overseas.
2. A significant number of new shooters buying guns and ammo.
3. Rioting and violence in a number of major U.S. cities with the local government placing restrictions on how the police were allowed to respond.
4. A presidential election year with the Democratic candidate being historically anti-gun and the Republican candidate being nominally pro-gun, which always drives gun & ammo sales up.
5. Contractual agreements with the military and law enforcement to produce enough ammo to meet their needs.
6. The lack of foreign made ammo to make up for domestic shortfalls in ammo production.
Posted By: keith Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 08:40 PM
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
jOe, Craig, Maybe between you the two of you, you could clarify exactly what the point of jOe's post is. If nothing else. explain why you still feel the election was fishy. Dozens of Trump appointees and Republiucan officials have made it clear the election was sound. I know that's an outcome you're unhappy about. Now you know how we Dems felt 4 years ago. We didn't refuse, however, to acknowledge that it actually happened. To continue to question the outcome has a name: brain-washed stupidity.


All we heard for four years was that Trump stole the 2016 election, and that he was helped by Russian trolls and Putin. rocky mtn bill, BrentD, Sissy Chrissy nca225, or any of our other Libtards have failed to prove that even one vote was influenced by anything Russia or Putin did. And they won't go near the fact that Obama used U.S. tax dollars in an attempt to influence the Israeli election against Netanyahu.

Quite a few of the lawsuits that Trump and his legal team filed post-election were not tossed out because there was no evidence of fraud. There is plenty of evidence of fraud that Billy and other supporters of anti-gun Democrats continue to deny. I have posted lots of it for Bill several times. We know that thousands of dead people voted. We know that millions of mail-in ballots were cast without any effort to verify identity, citizenship, or valid voter registration, We know for a fact that many people cast multiple ballots, and even crossed state lines to vote in neighboring states. We know that there were quite a few people in Wayne County, Michigan who were added to voter rolls, and all had birth dates of 1900. We even saw a photo posted here of a computer monitor with a list of all of those 120 year old Biden voters.

We all know how Democrats like rocky mtn bill feel about Voter I.D. requirements. We know all about the Dominion Voting Machines that leading Democrats complained were vulnerable to hacking and manipulation in the past, and we know about the so-called glitch in the software that switched Trump votes to Biden.

We know that many of the lawsuits were tossed because Judges didn't believe the obvious cheating would change the outcome. We know Judges incorrectly decided to allow the counting of votes that were post-marked late, not because that was the law, but because they decided to not disenfranchise anyone, even though the ballots were clearly invalid under the law. We know that the recent Texas lawsuit was tossed by the SCOTUS because of the excuse that Texas did not have legal standing to challenge fraud that essentially nullified the votes and the will of the majority in Texas. We know that some lawsuits were tossed, not due to a lack of evidence, but due to the idea that the suits should have been filed much earlier when the potential for massive fraud was first known.

We also know about RINO's and Never Trumper's and Republicans who would be quite content to see Washington return to business as usual. We know what motivates Mitt Romney and George Bush to hate Trump. We know that the Lincoln Project is not composed of real Republicans who would rather see an anti-2nd Amendment Socialist become president.

Billy knows all of this, but he is another Democrat sock-puppet who wants us to just ignore criminal election fraud that nullified the votes of millions of legal registered voters. For supporters of anti-gun Democrats like Billy and the other Libtard voters here, the ends justify the means... even though election fraud is a Federal crime.
Posted By: canvasback Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 08:40 PM
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
jOe, Craig, Maybe between you the two of you, you could clarify exactly what the point of jOe's post is. If nothing else. explain why you still feel the election was fishy. Dozens of Trump appointees and Republiucan officials have made it clear the election was sound. I know that's an outcome you're unhappy about. Now you know how we Dems felt 4 years ago. We didn't refuse, however, to acknowledge that it actually happened. To continue to question the outcome has a name: brain-washed stupidity.


I have to use Craig's new term.....makeupshititis! Too good. I'm going to rememebr that one.

Bill, you liar. The Dems spent the last 4 years absolutely refusing to accept Trump as "their" president and making stuff up at every turn (Can you say Russian Collusion?) in an effort to negate the electoral will of the people who voted Trump into office.

I can accept you are willfully blind to the statistical and other evidence that suggests strongly the election was stolen. But please stop trying to change history and excuse the disgusting display of partisanship that has gone on for the last four years by the Dems and the MSM, in an attempt to bring the Office of the President into disrepute.

I'm fine with partisanship. It was the Dems never ending quest to call into question Trump's electoral legitimacy.
Posted By: BrentD, Prof Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 08:46 PM
cb, now you are making stuff up. Of course the Russians were involved in helping Trump win in '16. That's not debatable (except by surrealists). Whether Trump had anything to do with it, is open for debate, but not the fact that they were doing more than crossing their fingers that Trump would win.

And then there is the current election. Again, you know, we all know, it was won straight up. There are no creditable statistical or other evidence to the contrary. Let's just get over that one and move on.

You don't want to be the very thing you are labeling others. If you keep up that charade, you are.
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 08:53 PM
Oh the phantom fraud, the phantom fraud.

Hey CB, care to comment on how these actions are in line with your highly espoused principles of Democracy?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasrei...sh=146d7e10ce2b
Posted By: craigd Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 08:54 PM
Originally Posted By: rocky mtn bill
....Now you know how we Dems felt 4 years ago. We didn't refuse, however, to acknowledge that it actually happened. To continue to question the outcome has a name: brain-washed stupidity.

bill, you're doing an awful lot of unneeded extrapolating, if sounding stupid is your goal? Cocked and locked is a legitimate carry phrase that law abiding citizens use, this isn't cynthia johnson of deetro type instilling of hate and violence is it?

You can feel any way that you want, you're welcome for selectively retaining that right for you. Since you're such a smart fellow, what do you make of the record number of background checks for law abiding firearm purchases this year, and the number of first time firearm buyers?

Hey, I heard they cutoff the registration to vote in the Georgia Senate runoffs next month. Ain't that offensive, or stac abrams lost her mojo with the post office? Always looking forward, you should fry it?
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 08:54 PM
Originally Posted By: canvasback


I can accept you are willfully blind to the statistical and other evidence that suggests strongly the election was stolen. But please stop trying to change history and excuse the disgusting display of partisanship that has gone on for the last four years by the Dems and the MSM, in an attempt to bring the Office of the President into disrepute.


I've found that statistics in addition to $3.00 gets me a cup of coffee.
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:01 PM
Originally Posted By: keith
We know that thousands of dead people voted.


Hey, if a dead guy can get elected to office, then shouldn't dead people be allowed to vote fo him? Seems fair to me.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...ion/6157987002/

Oh look, another dead republican from Covid-19. I'll have to say some nice things about him elsewhere. This stuff is keeping me busy now.
Posted By: canvasback Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:02 PM
Brent. The whole point of the Russian thing was to demonstrate COLLUSION between the Russians and Trump. We all know the Russians, and other parties try to interfere in elections. What counts is when one of the candidates is involved. And despite the best efforts of the swamp, no such connection could be made.

Next.
Posted By: craigd Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:03 PM
Originally Posted By: canvasback
....Bill, you liar. The Dems spent the last 4 years absolutely refusing to accept Trump as "their" president and making stuff up at every turn (Can you say Russian Collusion?) in an effort to negate the electoral will of the people who voted Trump into office....

Whoa, I am offended. They were fighting for the myth of the existential threat, and respecting jo's privacy to deal with hunt's alleged kiddie porn, incestuous, stripper, drug fueled amnesia binges. Oops, where did that come from, am I starting a resume for running as a dementia dem for school board and swim coach?
Posted By: canvasback Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:05 PM
Originally Posted By: nca225
Oh the phantom fraud, the phantom fraud.

Hey CB, care to comment on how these actions are in line with your highly espoused principles of Democracy?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasrei...sh=146d7e10ce2b



Would I care to comment? Sure.

I have no problem with Trump checking with the military if there appears to be a coup underway perpetrated by widespread, organized cheating at the polls. No problem whatsoever. I also think the perps of said coup, if proven to have been attempted, should be tried on charges of treason.
Posted By: craigd Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:11 PM
Originally Posted By: BrentD
....now you are making stuff up. Of course the Russians were involved in helping Trump win in '16. That's not debatable (except by surrealists). Whether Trump had anything to do with it, is open for debate....

So, are you saying that it was not russia that sold the dossier to you gal hill's campaign. Maybe, it was made in china, where they do all those big investments with hunt? Or, maybe it was made up on social media, like how your dementia compromised hero was duped into appointing an executive to make progressive policy for the simpleton followers?
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:12 PM
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: nca225
Oh the phantom fraud, the phantom fraud.

Hey CB, care to comment on how these actions are in line with your highly espoused principles of Democracy?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasrei...sh=146d7e10ce2b



Would I care to comment? Sure.

I have no problem with Trump checking with the military if there appears to be a coup underway perpetrated by widespread, organized cheating at the polls. No problem whatsoever. I also think the perps of said coup, if proven to have been attempted, should be tried on charges of treason.


And then the reverse is true isn't it? If there is no fraud and they attempt to use the military to overturn the election and the democratically implemented will of the people, I guess its treason for all those who support that action right CB?
Posted By: canvasback Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:26 PM
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: nca225
Oh the phantom fraud, the phantom fraud.

Hey CB, care to comment on how these actions are in line with your highly espoused principles of Democracy?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasrei...sh=146d7e10ce2b



Would I care to comment? Sure.

I have no problem with Trump checking with the military if there appears to be a coup underway perpetrated by widespread, organized cheating at the polls. No problem whatsoever. I also think the perps of said coup, if proven to have been attempted, should be tried on charges of treason.


And then the reverse is true isn't it? If there is no fraud and they attempt to use the military to overturn the election and the democratically implemented will of the people, I guess its treason for all those who support that action right CB?


Of course.

I hope you weren't thinking you had lured me into some ethical trap and it was a gotcha moment. LOL
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:29 PM
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Brent. The whole point of the Russian thing was to demonstrate COLLUSION between the Russians and Trump. We all know the Russians, and other parties try to interfere in elections. What counts is when one of the candidates is involved. And despite the best efforts of the swamp, no such connection could be made.

Next.


You don't get to "next" when you have the wrong answer CB.

https://time.com/5572821/donald-trump-russia-contacts/
Posted By: canvasback Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:34 PM
Originally Posted By: BrentD
cb, now you are making stuff up. Of course the Russians were involved in helping Trump win in '16. That's not debatable (except by surrealists). Whether Trump had anything to do with it, is open for debate, but not the fact that they were doing more than crossing their fingers that Trump would win.

And then there is the current election. Again, you know, we all know, it was won straight up. There are no creditable statistical or other evidence to the contrary. Let's just get over that one and move on.

You don't want to be the very thing you are labeling others. If you keep up that charade, you are.




Brent, Obama interfered in our last general election. Tom Steyer has regularly campaigned and donated money to defeat right of centre Canadian provincial and federal candidates and influence Canadian policy. Canadians have a long history of attempting to influence US elections. We donate to campaigns despite explicit rules against it. Hell, I've seen many reports in the papers of Canadians traveling to the US to work on Democratic campaigns. Typically it's Canadians supporting Dems.

I don't recall you getting all indignant about those efforts. Same goes for Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the senior Dem brain trust. More hypocrisy from the Left.



Posted By: canvasback Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:38 PM
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Brent. The whole point of the Russian thing was to demonstrate COLLUSION between the Russians and Trump. We all know the Russians, and other parties try to interfere in elections. What counts is when one of the candidates is involved. And despite the best efforts of the swamp, no such connection could be made.

Next.


You don't get to "next" when you have the wrong answer CB.

https://time.com/5572821/donald-trump-russia-contacts/


Really Chris? Exactly where was I wrong.

From your article
Quote:
....while Mueller may not have found any evidence that Trump associates conspired with Russia to interfere in the election...


After several years of investigation no collusion. But you want the investigations into potential fraud in this past election abandoned after 30 days. LOL

Maybe just stop this line of inquiry while you, Bill and Brent are behind. laugh
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:43 PM
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: nca225
Oh the phantom fraud, the phantom fraud.

Hey CB, care to comment on how these actions are in line with your highly espoused principles of Democracy?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasrei...sh=146d7e10ce2b



Would I care to comment? Sure.

I have no problem with Trump checking with the military if there appears to be a coup underway perpetrated by widespread, organized cheating at the polls. No problem whatsoever. I also think the perps of said coup, if proven to have been attempted, should be tried on charges of treason.


And then the reverse is true isn't it? If there is no fraud and they attempt to use the military to overturn the election and the democratically implemented will of the people, I guess its treason for all those who support that action right CB?


Of course.

I hope you weren't thinking you had lured me into some ethical trap and it was a gotcha moment. LOL


Not for a moment CB, but what if we remove the variable of the military? In fact, I'm pretty sure that treason doesn't require the of the military.

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't your premise that its the election fraud that would result in the coup right?

So I just want to be sure, that if you agree the inverse is true as well, then a coup, just as well could be attempted, by attempting to stay in power by claiming fraud that never occurred. And that would be treason to right?

Do you agree with that CB?
Posted By: canvasback Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:45 PM
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback

Would I care to comment? Sure.

I have no problem with Trump checking with the military if there appears to be a coup underway perpetrated by widespread, organized cheating at the polls. No problem whatsoever. I also think the perps of said coup, if proven to have been attempted, should be tried on charges of treason.


And then the reverse is true isn't it? If there is no fraud and they attempt to use the military to overturn the election and the democratically implemented will of the people, I guess its treason for all those who support that action right CB?


Of course.

I hope you weren't thinking you had lured me into some ethical trap and it was a gotcha moment. LOL


Not for a moment CB, but what if we remove the variable of the military? In fact, I'm pretty sure that treason doesn't require the of the military.

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't your premise that its the election fraud that would result in the coup right?

So I just want to be sure, that if you agree the inverse is true as well, then a coup, just as well could be attempted, by attempting to stay in power by claiming fraud that never occurred. And that would be treason to right?

Do you agree with that CB?


Of course I agree with that, if it were a deliberate and false accusation.

There are a myriad of ways to attempt a coup, not all utilizing the military. Now, I'm not expert in US law but I suspect any effort, by any means, to change the government in ways other than that laid out by the US Constitution could be considered a coup and would be illegal. And that would include any effort to subvert the constitutionally laid out process for changing (or keeping) the President following an election.
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 09:55 PM
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Brent. The whole point of the Russian thing was to demonstrate COLLUSION between the Russians and Trump. We all know the Russians, and other parties try to interfere in elections. What counts is when one of the candidates is involved. And despite the best efforts of the swamp, no such connection could be made.

Next.


You don't get to "next" when you have the wrong answer CB.

https://time.com/5572821/donald-trump-russia-contacts/


Really Chris? Exactly where was I wrong.

From your article
Quote:
....while Mueller may not have found any evidence that Trump associates conspired with Russia to interfere in the election...


After several years of investigation no collusion. But you want the investigations into potential fraud in this past election abandoned after 30 days. LOL

Maybe just stop this line of inquiry while you, Bill and Brent are behind. laugh


Well CB, I read both volumes of the mueller report, did you?. If you take the time to read it you'll see where you are wrong.

For instance how do you explain Paul Manafort providing campaign information to Konstantin Kilimnik?

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/18...nel-says-397597

How do you explain the multiple felonies Roger Stone was convicted of including about lying to congress about his contacts with Russia and Wikileaks?

https://apnews.com/article/ad355d2c983e4a7c85bc17e86d8c563f

Better yet, here a is a .pdf of the report. My bet is if you read it all, you might come to regret grasping onto Bill Barr's words.

https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5955997-Muellerreport
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 10:01 PM
Originally Posted By: canvasback

Of course I agree with that, if it were a deliberate and false accusation.

There are a myriad of ways to attempt a coup, not all utilizing the military. Now, I'm not expert in US law but I suspect any effort, by any means, to change the government in ways other than that laid out by the US Constitution could be considered a coup and would be illegal. And that would include any effort to subvert the constitutionally laid out process for changing (or keeping) the President following an election.


Agreed!
Posted By: Run With The Fox Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 10:11 PM
Becoming a member of the NRA and supporting the second ammendment should be mandatory for every new POTUS and Vice_POTUS too. They don't have to be gun owners, hunters or competition shooters- Trump is none of those, but he is a staunch supporter of our Constitutional right to own and bear arms. Look at it this way, if you like- our POTUS is sworn to endorse and support All 10 amendments, with no exception- None, Nada, Nicht, Non--

What concerns me is when Biden "buys the farm" while in office, and we get that Kamela Harris- if you thought, as I did, that Hillary would have been a disaster as our POTUS, well lads, as the old song goes:"You ain't seen nothin' yet" Hell of a thought for 2021, ain't it?? RWTF
Posted By: canvasback Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 10:21 PM
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: nca225
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Brent. The whole point of the Russian thing was to demonstrate COLLUSION between the Russians and Trump. We all know the Russians, and other parties try to interfere in elections. What counts is when one of the candidates is involved. And despite the best efforts of the swamp, no such connection could be made.

Next.


You don't get to "next" when you have the wrong answer CB.

https://time.com/5572821/donald-trump-russia-contacts/


Really Chris? Exactly where was I wrong.

From your article
Quote:
....while Mueller may not have found any evidence that Trump associates conspired with Russia to interfere in the election...


After several years of investigation no collusion. But you want the investigations into potential fraud in this past election abandoned after 30 days. LOL

Maybe just stop this line of inquiry while you, Bill and Brent are behind. laugh


Well CB, I read both volumes of the mueller report, did you?. If you take the time to read it you'll see where you are wrong.

For instance how do you explain Paul Manafort providing campaign information to Konstantin Kilimnik?

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/18...nel-says-397597

How do you explain the multiple felonies Roger Stone was convicted of including about lying to congress about his contacts with Russia and Wikileaks?

https://apnews.com/article/ad355d2c983e4a7c85bc17e86d8c563f

Better yet, here a is a .pdf of the report. My bet is if you read it all, you might come to regret grasping onto Bill Barr's words.

https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5955997-Muellerreport


Bikl Barr is no friend to Trump. If they could have proved something, Trump would have been charged.

And while we are on the subject.....


During his tenure as Attorney General, William Barr:

Allowed Jeffrey Epstein to die in custody

Prevented any investigation of Epstein’s death

Did a fake investigation of the Obama Administration and the intelligence community

Allowed the Obama Administration and the intelligence community to get away with spying on Donald Trump

Sat back and allowed states to violate the most basic rights of citizens, permanently destroying all of our hard fought civil rights

Allowed multinational corporations to lobby to have the wealth of the middle class transferred to them via the coronavirus hoax

Allowed Black Lives Matter and Antifa to riot endlessly, making Donald Trump look weak and securing the right of these leftists to do literally whatever they want

Allowed the FBI to refuse to investigate Antifa, claiming that they’re an idea, setting the stage for the organization to act with impunity indefinitely

Refused to protect the civil rights of those victimized by antifa, often opting to prosecute them instead

Refused to enforce the First Amendment against Google, Facebook and Twitter, allowing for the establishment of a mass censorship regime

Refused to enforce antitrust laws against big tech

Refused to enforce privacy laws against big tech

Allowed for the imprisonment and prosecution of an entire list of political prisoners

Ensured that Julian Assange was arrested and tortured in a British prison, ultimately ensuring that he will be brought to face fake charges in America, destroying the life of a true hero and also further eroding our speech rights

Allowed for states to do mass mail-in voting, ultimately ensuring the victory of Joe Biden in the presidential election

Refused to investigate massive voter fraud uncovered in Minnesota, which would have totally undermined the entire mail-in voting agenda

Spent virtually his entire tenure covering up the crimes of Joe Biden’s family

Refused to investigate voter fraud

Falsely claimed there was no evidence of voter fraud.
Posted By: nca225 Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 10:42 PM
Originally Posted By: canvasback
Originally Posted By: nca225

Well CB, I read both volumes of the mueller report, did you?. If you take the time to read it you'll see where you are wrong.

For instance how do you explain Paul Manafort providing campaign information to Konstantin Kilimnik?

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/18...nel-says-397597

How do you explain the multiple felonies Roger Stone was convicted of including about lying to congress about his contacts with Russia and Wikileaks?

https://apnews.com/article/ad355d2c983e4a7c85bc17e86d8c563f

Better yet, here a is a .pdf of the report. My bet is if you read it all, you might come to regret grasping onto Bill Barr's words.

https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=5955997-Muellerreport


Bikl Barr is no friend to Trump. If they could have proved something, Trump would have been charged.

And while we are on the subject.....


During his tenure as Attorney General, William Barr:

Allowed Jeffrey Epstein to die in custody

Prevented any investigation of Epstein’s death

Did a fake investigation of the Obama Administration and the intelligence community

Allowed the Obama Administration and the intelligence community to get away with spying on Donald Trump

Sat back and allowed states to violate the most basic rights of citizens, permanently destroying all of our hard fought civil rights

Allowed multinational corporations to lobby to have the wealth of the middle class transferred to them via the coronavirus hoax

Allowed Black Lives Matter and Antifa to riot endlessly, making Donald Trump look weak and securing the right of these leftists to do literally whatever they want

Allowed the FBI to refuse to investigate Antifa, claiming that they’re an idea, setting the stage for the organization to act with impunity indefinitely

Refused to protect the civil rights of those victimized by antifa, often opting to prosecute them instead

Refused to enforce the First Amendment against Google, Facebook and Twitter, allowing for the establishment of a mass censorship regime

Refused to enforce antitrust laws against big tech

Refused to enforce privacy laws against big tech

Allowed for the imprisonment and prosecution of an entire list of political prisoners

Ensured that Julian Assange was arrested and tortured in a British prison, ultimately ensuring that he will be brought to face fake charges in America, destroying the life of a true hero and also further eroding our speech rights

Allowed for states to do mass mail-in voting, ultimately ensuring the victory of Joe Biden in the presidential election

Refused to investigate massive voter fraud uncovered in Minnesota, which would have totally undermined the entire mail-in voting agenda

Spent virtually his entire tenure covering up the crimes of Joe Biden’s family

Refused to investigate voter fraud

Falsely claimed there was no evidence of voter fraud.


Wow, That is an exhaustive list of complaints CB!
Posted By: rocky mtn bill Re: Ammo for our firearms - 12/20/20 10:56 PM
CB, Now that the Russians have been shown to have hacked our national security systems for months , and our "President" hasn't stepped up to raise even the mildest objection, maybe you could grant the possiblity they did whatever they could to elect him. It's quite a distinction for Americans to boast of a President whom the country's biggest foe prefers. Craig, here's what I make of the increased firearms- ammo purchases: Conservaturds like you and jOe, terrified at the concept of a middle-of-the-road administration, panicked into hoarding. It's what happens whenever a sane President wins an election.
© The DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com