doublegunshop.com - home
Posted By: Small Bore Intercepting safety photo - 09/09/13 03:09 PM
There was thread on intercepting safety mechanisms recently. I stripped this Hughes boxlock today and though some may be interested to see the safety sear.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=...e=1&theater
Posted By: gil russell Re: Intercepting safety photo - 09/09/13 09:48 PM
That is amazing. I have never seen one like that. are they common?
Posted By: ellenbr Re: Intercepting safety photo - 09/09/13 10:59 PM
I suspect it is closer to the patent & it may be that H.A. Lindner modified the Daly version a bit:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=58lCAAA...882&f=false
U.S. of A. Patent 305,265 - September 16, 1884

http://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbt...true#Post272667

Dig I suppose that example was made post 1882?

Kind Regards,

Raimey
rse
Posted By: Bilious Bob Re: Intercepting safety photo - 09/09/13 11:05 PM
This should be no great shakes for an expert...

It's merely the Anson intercepting sear, patented in 1876.

Common stuff on many English boxlocks.
Posted By: Daryl Hallquist Re: Intercepting safety photo - 09/10/13 04:37 PM
I'm not sure if "intercepting safety" is a proper term for the photo involved. It seems that all safeties are intercepting. Here , on Hollowell's website is a good description of "intercepting sear". Note the pictures attached, too.

http://www.hallowellco.com/abbrevia.htm#I
Posted By: ellenbr Re: Intercepting safety photo - 09/10/13 08:27 PM
Mr. Hallquist:
I think it more closely follows the 1882 British patent that any other I've seen. Compare the two and the term may be safety scear. Ir that also called the Fly on the sidelock?

Kind Regards,

Raimey
rse
© The DoubleGun BBS @ doublegunshop.com