S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
2 members (Researcher, Carcano),
474
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,519
Posts562,298
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,812 |
A little hint about da stars. You fellers ever heard of averaging? Now I happen to know that ratings were averaged on the Deluxe version of this board (one before this one) because the average was given out to two decimal places below the stars in the member profile. I don't know that our current software supports such sophistication but I would guess that it does. If I happen to be right, every time you give a guy a star, you help lock him into a gentleman's D- (1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1/9=YEH THAT'S RIGHT: 1). So Jimmy, give your buds a break, and five stars! They'll go away fast enuf. I'm happy with my totally average gent's "C" but in case anyone feels the urge to bust me back, she should know that I have many friends and relatives who would be happy to register just for the sheer fun of playing Gimme 5. As the man said, "I am America and so can you.".
jack
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Dogfox
|
03/09/08 12:02 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Mike Harrell
|
03/09/08 12:26 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
03/09/08 01:10 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
woodsrunner38
|
03/09/08 03:49 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
dblfever
|
03/09/08 03:58 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Robt. Harris
|
03/09/08 04:26 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
03/09/08 05:00 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Pete
|
03/09/08 05:58 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
GregSY
|
03/09/08 07:08 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Jimmy W
|
03/09/08 07:09 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Jerry V Lape
|
03/09/08 10:05 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
dubbletrubble
|
03/09/08 10:51 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Dave Weber
|
03/10/08 12:37 AM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
L. Brown
|
03/09/08 07:24 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
gjw
|
03/09/08 08:57 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
rabbit
|
03/10/08 02:02 AM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Jimmy W
|
03/10/08 02:24 AM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
03/10/08 02:46 AM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
George L.
|
03/10/08 03:23 AM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
gjw
|
03/10/08 11:02 AM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
L. Brown
|
03/10/08 12:45 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
keith
|
03/11/08 11:35 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
JayCee
|
03/11/08 11:42 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
keith
|
03/12/08 01:01 AM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Jagermeister
|
03/10/08 12:52 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
L. Brown
|
03/10/08 06:09 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Jimmy W
|
03/10/08 06:37 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
HomelessjOe
|
03/10/08 07:01 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Fred Lowe
|
03/10/08 08:53 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
gjw
|
03/10/08 10:50 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
L. Brown
|
03/11/08 11:03 AM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
Robe763
|
03/10/08 09:11 PM
|
Re: first post, 5 stars, is rating system f'd up?
|
rabbit
|
03/10/08 09:58 PM
|
|
|
|