I guess I should have prefaced my question with a little more information. I don't want to call myself a gunsmith, but have a complete shop and have worked on shotguns for over 30 years. I took Jack Rowe's class on English and European guns about 10 years ago. So I am very familar with ejector systems and how they function. I'm not holding the muzzel up allowing the shells to fall out. When the gun is opened without firing either barrel the cases are lifted up just as they should be. By taking the wood off I can see the mechanism is working as it should - the proper ejector is firing with the proper trigger pull and the other side is lifting the shell as it should. The barrel that hasn't been fired is not throwing the hull as far as the fired side. I have used loaded dummy hulls thinking it was a weight issue. That has made no difference. It does eject the fired hulls about 6 feet, which is more than any other gun I've seen. I'm wondering if the ejector springs are to strong and recoil from the first spring is "bouncing" the unfired hull out. I just can't imagine an English gun of that vintage being "turned loose" with that type of problem. Please continue to give me some more ideas and THANK YOU for your help! Still going nuts, Don.
