|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,491
Posts562,018
Members14,584
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,082
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,082 |
you can also thin epoxy with lacquer thinner to make it flow better. Mix the two parts first then just add a few drops of thinner and your good to go. More thinner ..well it gets ...thinner.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,785 Likes: 673
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,785 Likes: 673 |
Bill, You read my mind about the best glue for wood that might not be perfectly de-oiled. But I'd be interested in knowing why you don't recommend poly otherwise. Any others' experiences are most appreciated too. Trouble is, most of the time when I see a glue joint that sticks out like a sore thumb, I have no idea what was used and therefore what to avoid... except for the J-B Weld jobs, which you must admit is nicer than carriage bolts and farmers nuts. Thanks, Keith
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 606
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 606 |
In my experience, neither Titebond II, nor poly glue is anywhere near as strong as Acraglas. Also, and someone with a chemistry background can explain this better than me, epoxies like Acraglas, that take 24 hours or longer to come to a full cure, are MUCH stronger than 5 minute or 1 hour epoxies. It has to do with the length of the molecular chains that are formed during the curing process.
|
|
|
|
|
|