|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
9 members (Hoot4570, ithaca1, NCTarheel, LGF, JBG, 1 invisible),
2,045
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,987
Posts569,110
Members14,652
| |
Most Online19,682
Mar 28th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 127
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 127 |
It's that time of year and I'm in the process of adding a dozen or so thin coats of oil to my gunstock. I've got about 5-6 coats on and I've done a round of wet sanding w/400 to fill the pores with slurry. I plan on doing a few more rounds of this, finishing up with 600.
The question is, should I alternate sanding directions with each round of slurry-sanding, or should I always sand in the direction of the grain? I thought I read somewhere that if you alternate the sanding directions between coats, the luster and depth of the finish is enhanced. Is this true or are the Turpentine fumes getting to me?
Thanks, Jim
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 474
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 474 |
I've done a good bit of sanded-in finishing and once you get to 400 and up I don't think it matters which direction you sand. What is important is that you sand every sq. in. properly. In my experience this requires that you do some cross-grain sanding in some areas, especially in heavily figured wood. I have never been able to detect any difference in the final finish in those areas as compared with the balance of the stock surface.
OB
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 572
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 572 |
Just my two cents. I have had good results by sanding a slurry with some rottenstone sprinkled in to make a thicker slurry. I sand in a circular motion and when the slurry starts to get real thick I use a motel room card (like a credit card but thinner and more plyable) and squeege it across the grain. Not with the grain as this tends to help pull the slurry out of the pores.
I let dry at leas 8 hours and sand back to the wood. I do this manufactured slurry at least four times before I look into the pores with a magnifing device(at least 10 power) and go on form there with stain, finish etc.
Regards, Gordon
Our Dogs make our lives better
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,468
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,468 |
Another finish method is to smear the finish by hand (NO SANDPAPER) when it get tacky then let dry and remove with 0000 steel wool.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 127
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 127 |
Thanks guys for the responses (maybe it's the fumes).
Gordon, good to be reminded again to wipe against the grain to fill pores. Sounds like a good technique with squeegee-ing into the wood.
I have to say I have been quite pleased with my wet-sanding.
Did 2 rounds with 400 and did my first round with 600 tonight. Will finish with another round of 600 with a wipe down in a couple days.
Then six more thin coats/wipedowns. It already looks much better than it did before I started.
Plus it's been fun to do.
-Jim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
