Violating my own proscription: Here are the relevant points:
. .1) The man is not well; he is possibly bi-polar. And, he contributes nothing but invective.
Gene, I only saved the relevant part of your lengthy post to make a point.
You are totally wrong when you say Keith contributes nothing but invective. My time is too important to me to go to the trouble Keith does, to look up past posts and link to them. But, Keith often posts with nothing but helpful and accurate information about the specific double guns about which he has knowledge. To deny this is to either exhibit your tunnel vision (that's what I believe it is) or to deny truth (which I do not believe you intentionally do).
I don't agree with or support everything Keith says any more than I do anyone else here. You have made that comment about him before, AIR, but before you do so again it might behoove you to do some close reading of Keith's old posts. Just because they are not about Reillys doesn't mean that they are not useful to others.
