I haven't used it as much as researchers like Steve Nash or AaronN, but more than enough to know it is far from infallible, and certainly will regurgitate information it finds whether it is accurate or not. I've demonstrated that right here over the last couple days in a simple on-topic query concerning frame cracking in Ithaca Flues shotguns. A.I. also recently provided wrong information on a problem with my truck, and a Husqvarna garden tractor transmission. You can refute that, or the notion that A.I. will actually make up shit when it can't find a seemingly good answer. You can refute the fact that A.I. won't acknowledge merely fabricating false answers when it is caught doing so. But you would be wrong.
On the other hand, I read a ChatGPT generated legal letter to a City Solicitor that was very well worded, and would potentially take work from a paralegal.
We haven't even touched on the hordes of college students who have been caught using A.I. to do their assigned work and thinking, and the danger of further dumbing down independent thought. We're already seeing false A.I. generated material being used to reshape politics, and have seen for example, retarded people who can't tell if an A.I. generated photo of Trump with 6 fingers and a missing leg is real or not. An A.I. platform that eventually corrects errors like that isn't necessarily a better thing. I've spent years working in and profiting from Automation, and am hardly a Luddite.
Please share where anyone said any of the things your ranting about.
See if you can keep your reply under 1,000 words, Larry, and avoid insults, name calling and invective.
I already shared it TransGomerJoff, can't you understand anything? Steve Nash posted his experiences with A.I. only days ago. AaronN, who has done extensive research on Pinfire guns, recently shared pretty much the same views, and you can go back and read his recent Posts.
The extremely incorrect information I got concerning the correct axle code for my truck popped up in a Google A.I. search because recently, most Google searches seem to default to A.I. It only cost me several additional hours of work when I replaced my rear axle and bearing.
Google A.I. also incorrectly informed me that a Husqvarna garden tractor transmission was hydrostatic, and barely moving in reverse because it was low on fluid. I went to several of the sources it quoted, and they advised things like drilling a hole in the sealed transmission to add fluid, and even what type of oil to use. I almost made the mistake of taking that advice, but dug further on another search engine. Turns out that it isn't hydrostatic at all, but a torque converter coupled to a sealed grease filled transaxle. The problem was fine grass clippings and dirt jammed under the torque converter.
The ChatGPT legal letter I recently read was done very well, as I said. I don't have access to it because it wasn't mine, and was sent to a City Solicitor. It certainly did not use the incorrect form of the word "you're" as you did in your first sentence. And less than 12 hours after you lectured Stan on contractions and correct use of an apostrophe. I love a know-it-all who steps on his own tongue.
It isn't hard to find accounts of college kids using A.I. to write term papers and do other assignments. Same for A.I. generated photos being used to falsely influence politics... unless you have your head in the sand or some other dark orifice.
Before you ask for a reply free of "insults, name calling, and invective", I'd suggest you go back and read the nasty things you've said to and about me here. Then you can just ESAD... you can do an A.I. search for the internet slang definition!
Sorry you can't digest or comprehend a longer Post. You can use A.I. to count my words to see if this exceeds 1000 words. But really, just about any reply anyone makes will challenge you. Best you stick to your Fisher-Price alphabet blocks or See-and-Say toy.
