|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
2 members (2 invisible),
422
guests, and
6
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,020
Posts569,556
Members14,655
| |
Most Online19,682 Mar 28th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62 Likes: 14 |
I’ve been reloading for too many years, never for extreme accuracy. For bolt actions loads just needed to be ‘minute of deer vitals’ at 300 yards. Double rifles and drillings, close enough at 100 yards to head out the door.
My setup for powder and dacron measuring, for a nitro-for-black loading for 43 Mauser, has a Lee Safety Powder Scale and a cheapo digital scale next to it. My recipe is 31.5 grains of IMR 4198 under 7 grains of dacron. When I pour the powder measured on the Lee scale at 31.5 onto the digital scale, it might vary .1 or .2 grains.
I don’t trust the digital scale, but just in case: Has anyone found any appreciable impact difference with very small variations in powder or filler? 1/10th of a grain is just over 0.3% of 31.5 grains….
Thinking of all of the variables: powder, neck tension, how steady am I really holding the rifle?, variation in bullet weight, minute changes in seating depth, variations in how the dacron fills the case, etc., I can’t imagine it makes that much difference, but checking with the collective wisdom on this board.
Thank you.
Also, I listed some 43 Mauser/.446 bullets in the classified section if anyone is interested.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 691 Likes: 65
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 691 Likes: 65 |
For that load don't worry about it, humidity can change it that much.
The ol' 11.15 X 60R is a fine cartridge, I love it in my 1870's Goldmann double rifle. If I didn't have an abundance of bullets and a couple molds I'd be all over those cast bullets.
Last edited by sharps4590; 04/19/26 05:53 PM.
NRA Benefactor 2008 NRA Patron 2007 NRA Endowment 1996 NRA Life 1988
|
|
1 member likes this:
Mt Al |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62 Likes: 14 |
Thanks, Sharps. I assumed that, given the circumstances, it wouldn't amount to much. Appreciate hearing other people's advice and experience.
I'm enjoying shooting my 43 Mauser double and look forward to using it on a critter this fall!
|
|
1 member likes this:
sharps4590 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,035 Likes: 402
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,035 Likes: 402 |
Mt Al, I agree with sharps 4590. You might watch what happens to your scale when the heat or a/c comes on. Sometimes moving air can cause variations. The "fix" is just a screen to block off the air. Enjoy that double. Mike
|
|
1 member likes this:
sharps4590 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,014 Likes: 828
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,014 Likes: 828 |
If you are weighing all of your powder charges to within plus or minus 1/10 of a grain, then you are as accurate as most guys who reload for varmint rifles. Many benchrest shooters using ball powders don't weigh each charge, but use very precise volumetric powder measures. The scale is only used to initially set the measure, and to periodically verify nothing has changed. . If you have any doubt about the accuracy of either of your scales, it's easy to check them for calibration. RCBC and other companies sell reloading scale check weights. But a cheaper alternative is to just have a few rifle bullets of different weights weighed on a calibrated analytical balance scale. Then scratch the actual weight on the jacket and keep them with your scales.
I did that when I was in college and used a Mettler H15 analytical balance we had in my organic chemistry lab. That thing was so sensitive that it could measure the difference between a bullet cleaned with acetone, and the same bullet with a fingerprint on it. You could probably get a Pharmacist to accurately weigh a few bullets, and convert from hundredths of a milligram to hundredths of a grain.
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 62 Likes: 14 |
Mike and Keith, thanks for the info and background. Good to know. I do have a few bullets I keep with the scale, 90 grain .270, 150 and 200 8mm and they check out very closely. When I put the charge on the digital scale after a few loads, it can wobble 1 or 2 10ths here and there. Not going to fret over it!
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 415 Likes: 45
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 415 Likes: 45 |
Just remember that digital scales are not absolute and can vary plus or minus half of the listed accuracy.
|
|
2 members like this:
Mt Al, sharps4590 |
|
|
|
|