Thanks for pointing that out. Not sure, It looks more like 18/C. . .and it looks like there's a 20 for some reason or another which technically shouldn't be there after 1887 (unless the barrels were reproofed after 1887?). Can't tell exactly. Could it be that it was a 20 gauge cylinder-bore proofed pre 1887, then bored out to 18 bore adding the chokes after 1887?

[Linked Image from jpgbox.com]

Last edited by Argo44; 02/25/26 07:45 PM.
Baluch are not Brahui, Brahui are Baluch