|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
|
2 members (SKB, LRF),
574
guests, and
6
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,889
Posts567,177
Members14,631
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,537 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,537 Likes: 390 |
Maybe you have someone else's gun rebarreled by Blissett and Son. Serial no. 1108 makes no sense for the 1870s as Blissett would have been in business for 40 years by then. Is your gun marked Blissett on the locks ? Are you sure of the "use number" actually being such ? In 1878 Blissett's serial numbers were in the 5000 range.
Last edited by Daryl Hallquist; 02/14/26 10:54 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,722 Likes: 1145
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,722 Likes: 1145 |
Finally... ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](http://i.imgur.com/IzFv1sAh.jpg) ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](http://i.imgur.com/oeQoCZJh.jpg) ![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](http://i.imgur.com/VpyGrJMh.jpg) Nice wood, eh? and I love those percussion fences. Daryl: No, it says "John Blissett & Son" on the locks and the numbers match on every section of the gun (trigger guard, action flats, and barrel lug). Perhaps the number range changed when the son joined? Perhaps the records have some issues? No matter really. Can't go much further with it at the moment. What else...6lbs11, 14 3/4 LOP, 30-inch 2-bar damascus tubes, nice bores, no chokes. Looks like a bit of cast off with some toe twist, somewhere close to 1 1/2 and 2 1/2. I'll measure it more thoroughly and then troll through the books at the shop next week sometime. An obscure one, for sure.
Last edited by Lloyd3; 02/16/26 09:28 AM.
|
|
2 members like this:
Parabola, Jtplumb |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,537 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,537 Likes: 390 |
I think the 1108 is a patent use number, not a serial number. Without info on the actual serial number and proofmarks it would be just a guess.
Last edited by Daryl Hallquist; 02/14/26 12:18 PM.
|
|
3 members like this:
Argo44, Jimmy W, Parabola |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,783 Likes: 253
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,783 Likes: 253 |
Just for you info it's not an island lock it's a peninsula lock. Island locks are completely surrounded by the stock wood. A very nice looking hammergun.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,722 Likes: 1145
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,722 Likes: 1145 |
I believe I mentioned that earlier, but thankyou.
Last edited by Lloyd3; 02/14/26 02:03 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,537 Likes: 390
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,537 Likes: 390 |
I am not sure of the numbers from the pictures, but could it be Pat. 324 from 1870 ?
British Patent 324 of 1870, registered in England, was granted to J. Thomas, a Birmingham gunmaker, for an improved single-bite, snap-action mechanism for shotguns. This patent, often referred to as the Thomas patent action, was significant in the development of breech-loading firearms and was licensed or used by various gun manufacturers during that era.
|
|
1 member likes this:
Parabola |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,722 Likes: 1145
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,722 Likes: 1145 |
Daryl: Thank you, that makes sense as this unit has a curious lock-up on the back lug.
I can understand why you might think the 1108 number is the use number here but why would it be stamped everywhere?
Last edited by Lloyd3; 02/14/26 02:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,323 Likes: 656
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,323 Likes: 656 |
Thanks , Ted!
Lloyd, Imgur decided to restrict access to UK users as they were concerned that they might incur liabilities under our new Online Safety Act.
Paul Roberts of J. Roberts and Son has just bought in a Jones hammer 12 bore by John Manton and Coe (sic) 1869+1871 vintage with a wedge fore-end retainer.
Interestingly it has later been converted (circa 1890) to selective ejectors.
Last edited by Parabola; 02/14/26 03:04 PM.
|
|
1 member likes this:
Ted Schefelbein |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,045 Likes: 1599
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,045 Likes: 1599 |
Thanks , Ted!
Lloyd, Imgur decided to restrict access to UK users as they were concerned that they might incur liabilities under our new Online Safety Act.
Paul Roberts of J. Roberts and Son has just bought in a Jones hammer 12 bore by John Manton and Coe (sic) 1869+1871 vintage with a wedge fore-end retainer.
Interestingly it has later been converted (circa 1890) to selective ejectors. Coming at you…. Best, Ted
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,045 Likes: 1599
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,045 Likes: 1599 |
Pretty sure our English Brothern will have a high degree in interest in this gun. Hopefully, these pictures are viewable in Olde Blighty. Best, Ted ![[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]](https://i.ibb.co/xtkj5m3m/IMG-1090.jpg) ![[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]](https://i.ibb.co/Ps4FNCdX/IMG-1089.jpg) ![[Linked Image from i.ibb.co]](https://i.ibb.co/HTcbWmHr/IMG-1088.jpg)
|
|
2 members like this:
Lloyd3, Parabola |
|
|
|
|