|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
5 members (SKB, Woodreaux, MattH, GMCS, 1 invisible),
1,879
guests, and
6
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,005
Posts569,288
Members14,653
| |
Most Online19,682 Mar 28th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,363 Likes: 683
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,363 Likes: 683 |
In 1920 the powers that be, afraid of Bolshevik revolution, put all rifled cartridge arms on Firearm Certificates.
I suspect the fact that, when we did have a General Strike not a shot was fired,,owed nothing to the Firearms Act 1920. It was all very British.
The need for Firearm Certificates, the expense of the ammunition and the improvements in .22 Long Rifle -with Non-Rusting you could shoot a couple of rabbits for supper and not need to clean the rifle - killed the market for Rook Rifles.
Many were bored out to .410 as no certificates were needed for shotguns until 1968. Most of those also had the front part of the barrel turned down ahead of the fore-end.
This, along with the metal bored out to .410 threw the balance well back towards the butt. I find those where the barrel exterior was left untouched handle better as .410 shotguns.
|
|
1 member likes this:
earlyriser |
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Bob Cash
|
12/20/25 09:05 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
ClapperZapper
|
12/20/25 09:18 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Parabola
|
12/20/25 11:45 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
eightbore
|
12/21/25 12:00 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
ClapperZapper
|
12/21/25 12:50 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Daryl Hallquist
|
12/20/25 11:57 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
canvasback
|
12/21/25 01:03 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
12/21/25 02:03 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Jimmy W
|
12/21/25 02:06 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Stanton Hillis
|
12/21/25 03:49 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Perry M. Kissam
|
01/12/26 04:33 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Stanton Hillis
|
12/21/25 04:04 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
HistoricBore
|
12/21/25 11:49 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Parabola
|
12/21/25 06:56 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
trw999
|
01/13/26 06:24 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Parabola
|
01/13/26 05:12 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Stanton Hillis
|
01/12/26 09:43 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Perry M. Kissam
|
01/13/26 07:06 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Stanton Hillis
|
01/13/26 11:00 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
aw1776
|
01/13/26 11:40 AM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Daryl Hallquist
|
01/13/26 04:14 PM
|
Re: Um, Uh, Too light??
|
Stanton Hillis
|
01/13/26 08:18 PM
|
|
|
|