After rereading all that junk I posted & more, me thinks Kutter is on the correct path & Schaefer sourced a H&R frame by some means & then a Liege tubeset & cobbled them both together. Now was the WR A&D Body Action frame w/ an APUN in English an orphan like a H&R having a blown tubeset, I can't say. But it would seem the preponderance of evidence tilts the scales in this direction. I think the key would be if the Belgian tubeset does not wear the number >>25<< anywhere. Like I said, Schaefer was past the heavily lifting & brute force effort and much more into repairs & rectification. Interesting Platform for sure, especially from a Historical Perspective.

On a Daly note, I do believe that Daly adopted Schaefer's source points or contacts....


Hochachtungsvoll,

Raimey
rse