I don’t mind known cost because I can decide if I want to pay them. I hate hidden or surprise fees which bite me on the …..
Like these?
The EU utilizes various non-tariff barriers (NTBs) that can hinder US exports. These include stringent regulatory requirements, technical barriers to trade (TBTs), sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures, and differing product standards. These measures, while often presented as public policy protections, can significantly increase costs and complexity for US businesses attempting to access the EU market.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
1. Regulatory Barriers:
Technical Barriers to Trade (TBTs):
These involve product standards, testing, and certification requirements that can differ significantly between the EU and the US. For example, the EU's push for the "CE" marking (conformité Européenne) on products sold in the EU can create compliance challenges for US manufacturers.
Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures:
These are regulations aimed at protecting human, animal, and plant health. While intended to ensure safety, they can be used to restrict imports, such as bans on hormone-treated beef or restrictions on GMOs, which disproportionately impact US agricultural exports.
Rules of Origin:
These determine the "nationality" of a product, which can affect tariffs and access to certain markets. Complex or burdensome rules of origin can create obstacles for US exporters.
2. Other NTBs:
Bureaucratic hurdles:
Excessive paperwork, complex customs procedures, and slow processing times can create significant delays and costs for US businesses.
Discriminatory tax treatments:
While not always explicitly discriminatory, differing VAT rates and other tax policies can create unfair competitive advantages for EU businesses.
Local content requirements:
These mandate that a certain percentage of a product's components or manufacturing must be sourced locally. This can disadvantage US companies that rely on global supply chains.
Failure to respect intellectual property rights:
Weak enforcement of intellectual property rights can discourage innovation and trade.
Forced technology transfers:
Requiring companies to transfer technology or intellectual property as a condition of market access is a serious barrier.
3. Impact on US-EU Trade:
Increased costs:
Complying with diverse regulations and navigating bureaucratic processes can significantly raise the cost of exporting to the EU.
Reduced market access:
NTBs can effectively block access to the EU market for certain US products, even if there are no tariffs.
Unfair competition:
NTBs can create an uneven playing field, favoring EU companies that are more familiar with the regulations and have established local operations.
Trade imbalances:
The EU's trade surplus with the US, partly fueled by NTBs, can exacerbate trade tensions between the two economic giants.
4. Examples of Specific NTBs:
EU's Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act:
These regulations are designed to curb the dominance of large tech companies, but critics argue they disproportionately target US tech giants.
EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism:
This mechanism, designed to address carbon leakage, imposes a carbon tax on imports based on their carbon footprint, potentially disadvantaging US industries with carbon-intensive supply chains.
EU's differing food safety standards:
The EU has stricter regulations on food safety than the US, which can lead to the rejection of US food products at the border due to issues like aflatoxin levels in nuts or the use of certain ingredients.
__________________________________
It’s about time we get some cool rules, or we’re going to be bogus too. Jeff Spicoli