Originally Posted by BrentD, Prof
Originally Posted by craigd
Originally Posted by L. Brown
Lots of talk in some places about arming teachers. The last place I taught high school, several of us had CC.

With all that goes along with the CC, this is a good thing. But, teachers plant the seeds of moral decay. We see them here, occasionally above the fray, but so often revealing the content of their character, and spelling out their social agendas. I believe no teacher should be compelled to carry, but those who vehemently decline might win themselves a place on awatchlist, lol.

No teacher in his or her right of mind would want be armed in school. The liability would be off the charts. Not to mention there is never any mention of hazard pay either. No one wants to pay for it on either end.

There has been at least one district in Iowa that has permitted it to happen, but no one is dumb enough to do it as of the most recent reports.

You really ought to think it through, but that is certainly not one of your stronger points. Oh well.

But, you're dumb enough to boast of taking your students hunting with you? No prof in their right mind would be dumb enough to take on the optics risk or the personal liability risk of an unofficial event. I have my hopes that you thought through any risk to as reasonable extents as possible, but you do tend to make emotional, knee jerk responses.

Being a creature of a state university system, you know first hand that many liabilities are controlled by legislation, as one possible solution. On the other hand, you're a supporter of prejudicial policies and agenda selective enforcement, that you can't even tell that I didn't knee jerk advocate.