https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-b...legal-aliens-have-constitutional-rights/Read to the end.
There is some wording that this court has zero'd in on and is arguably a valid interpretation.
That said, I would vehemently argue that ".
..rights are reserved for U.S.citizens" is incorrect.
The US Constitution protects those rights within territory in control of the US Government but the rights are inherent to ALL people.
Sadly, the vast majority of the world is not protected by the US Constitution.
If you are here illegally, you are a felon.....
Of course, Utah Sg and SKB would argue that they aren't convicted felons, but we know what happens when US citizen felons attempt a legal purchase. I wonder if SKB would transfer a denied nics on principal. It might be fun to be a one world order philosopher at the country club, but the currentadmin doesn't even have the inherent sense to protect US citizens abroad.
Of course I would argue they are not convicted. "Innocent until proven guilty."
In the case of of your "
US citizen felons", they have been
convicted of a felony. Yes?
I'd take it step further. Convicted but served your
ENTIRE sentence? To include prison time, parole and any restitution?
Your right to own a firearm, vote, etc. Automatically reinstated.
